IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14757-d968231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Value of Pelvic Floor Muscle Morphometry Using 3D/4D Ultrasound in Relation to the Success of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Hagovska

    (Department of Physiatry, Balneology, and Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
    Urogynecology and Physiotherapy in Gynecology and Urology, Clinic Centrum s.r.o., 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Ján Svihra

    (Department of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Peter Urdzik

    (Urogynecology and Physiotherapy in Gynecology and Urology, Clinic Centrum s.r.o., 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
    Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

The aim of our study was to establish the predictive value of pelvic floor muscle morphometry using 3D/4D ultrasound in relation to the success of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for 12 weeks in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A total of 86 women with SUI from regional gynaecological and urological outpatient clinics were enrolled on this cross-sectional study. SUI symptoms were assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI SF). Pelvic floor muscle function was evaluated using a perineometer. Pelvic floor muscle morphometry (PFMM) was evaluated by the size of the urogenital hiatus (HA in cm 2 ) at rest (R), at contraction (C) and during the Valsalva manoeuvre, i.e., a strong push (V), by 3D/4D USG. The intervention was PFMT for 12 weeks. After PFMT, we noted significant improvement in SUI symptoms, pelvic floor muscle function and morphometry. Moderately significant (0.001) negative correlations were confirmed between the total ICIQ-UI SF score and strength (−0.236 **) and endurance (−0.326 **) of the maximal voluntary contraction (MvC), the number of MvC lasting 3 s (−0.406 **) and 1 s (−0.338 **). Moderately significant (0.001) positive correlations were confirmed between the total ICIQ-UI SF score and R (r = 0.453 **), C (r = 0.533 **) and V (r = 0.442 **). The predictive value of PFMM reached a positive prediction of a decrease with an ICIQ-UI SF score below 8. HA during V was most strongly associated with SUI reduction, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ( p ≤ 0.001), a positive predictive value of 83.3%, a negative predictive value of 75.0%, sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 80.0%. The predictive values of pelvic floor muscle morphometry using 3D/4D USG confirmed the success of PFMT in women with SUI.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Hagovska & Ján Svihra & Peter Urdzik, 2022. "Predictive Value of Pelvic Floor Muscle Morphometry Using 3D/4D Ultrasound in Relation to the Success of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14757-:d:968231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Sarría-Santamera & Antonio Simone Laganà & Milan Terzic, 2022. "Women’s Health and Gynecology: Old Challenges and New Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-6, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14757-:d:968231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.