IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14358-d961491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Effectiveness in Thoracic Surgery—Objective Measurement with a Skin Conductance Algesimeter: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Sadowska

    (Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Allergology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Szymon Bialka

    (Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Piotr Palaczynski

    (Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Damian Czyzewski

    (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Jacek Smereka

    (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Anna Szelka-Urbanczyk

    (Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Hanna Misiolek

    (Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Chest surgery is associated with significant pain, and potent opioid medications are the primary medications used for pain relief. Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) combined with regional anaesthesia is promoted as an alternative in patients with an opioid contraindication. Methods: Objective: To assess the efficacy of OFA combined with a paravertebral block in pain treatment during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Design: A randomized, open-label study. Setting: A single university hospital between December 2015 and March 2018. Participants: Sixty-six patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracic surgery were randomized into two groups. Of these, 16 were subsequently excluded from the analysis. Interventions: OFA combined with a paravertebral block with 0.5% bupivacaine in the OFA group; typical general anaesthesia with opioids in the control group. Main outcome measures: Intraoperative nociceptive intensity measured with a skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) and traditional intraoperative monitoring. Results: Higher mean blood pressure was observed in the control group before induction and during intubation ( p = 0.0189 and p = 0.0095). During chest opening and pleural drainage, higher SCA indications were obtained in the control group ( p = 0.0036 and p = 0.0253), while in the OFA group, the SCA values were higher during intubation ( p = 0.0325). SCA during surgery showed more stable values in the OFA group. Pearson analysis revealed a positive correlation between the SCA indications and mean blood pressure in both groups. Conclusions: OFA combined with a paravertebral block provides effective nociception control during video-assisted thoracic surgery and can be an alternative for general anaesthesia with opioids. OFA provides a stable nociception response during general anaesthesia, as measured by SCA.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Sadowska & Szymon Bialka & Piotr Palaczynski & Damian Czyzewski & Jacek Smereka & Anna Szelka-Urbanczyk & Hanna Misiolek, 2022. "Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Effectiveness in Thoracic Surgery—Objective Measurement with a Skin Conductance Algesimeter: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14358-:d:961491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14358-:d:961491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.