IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14004-d955345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information

Author

Listed:
  • Cathrin Brøndbo Larsen

    (Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Rheumatology, St. Olavs University Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Heidi Gilstad

    (Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Modern healthcare is becoming increasingly technologized, knowledge-intensive, and specialized, which has consequences for communication between patients and practitioners in clinical encounters. Health information is increasingly accessible to patients through online resources. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of existing studies that address how patients communicate with practitioners about online health information and to identify the key topics raised in these studies. With the concept of eHealth literacy as its point of departure, this paper specifically highlights the eHealth literacy topic of how patients comprehend , appraise and communicate online health information before and during the encounter with the healthcare professionals. In the literature search, we focus on qualitative studies that consider patients’ and/or practitioners’ reflections on online health information. We searched PUBMED, SCOPUS and Web of Science to capture research from various fields. Sixteen studies were included that met the following criteria: Qualitative study, focus on patient-practitioner communication, eHealth literacy and online information. The results show that the vast majority of studies were based on qualitative interviews, addressing patients’ and practitioners’ perspectives. Key topics in studies addressing patient perspectives were: reasons for seeking online information ; calibrating understanding of online information with the practitioner; and barriers to discussing online information with practitioners. Key topics raised in studies focusing on practitioners were: trust in the patient and the online health information he/she presented as well as strategies to respond to patients who referred to online health information. The review highlights the need for further qualitative studies, preferably observational studies from authentic clinical communication situations, in order to capture how patients and practitioners communicate about online health information.

Suggested Citation

  • Cathrin Brøndbo Larsen & Heidi Gilstad, 2022. "Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14004-:d:955345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joy Agner & Katharine Elizabeth Bau & Dirk Bruland, 2024. "An Introduction to Health Literacy and Social Contexts with Recommendations for Health Professionals and Researchers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14004-:d:955345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.