IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13852-d952360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Montes

    (Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Jéssica Sanmarco

    (Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Mercedes Novo

    (Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Blanca Cea

    (Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Ramón Arce

    (Unidad de Psicología Forense, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

Abstract

The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Montes & Jéssica Sanmarco & Mercedes Novo & Blanca Cea & Ramón Arce, 2022. "Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13852-:d:952360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Chanda & Masauso Chirwa & Ackson Tyson Mwale & Kalunga Cindy Nakazwe & Ireen Manase Kabembo & Bruce Nkole, 2024. "Perceived Social Support and Health Care Spending as Moderators in the Association of Traditional Bullying Perpetration with Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Victimisation among Adolescents in 2," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Francisca Fariña & Juan Romero & Manuel Isorna & Ramón Arce, 2023. "Profiling and Prevalence of Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders and Behavioural Addictions in Incarcerated Traffic Offenders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Omar A. Alismaiel, 2023. "Digital Media Used in Education: The Influence on Cyberbullying Behaviors among Youth Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13852-:d:952360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.