IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13772-d950916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Green Innovation in Chinese Resource-Based Cities: Based on SBM-Undesirable and Spatial Durbin Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yaguai Yu

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
    Donghai Academy, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Zanzan Xu

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Panyi Shen

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Lening Zhang

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Taohan Ni

    (Business School, University of Nottingham, Ningbo 315199, China)

Abstract

Based on data from 64 resource-based cities in China from 2010 to 2019, the efficiency of green innovation is evaluated by using the super-efficiency SBM Model with undesired outputs, while influencing factors of green innovation efficiency are analyzed by the spatial Durbin model. The results are as follows. First, as for the efficiency evaluation, the average green innovation efficiency in 62 resource-based cities from 2010 to 2019 is only 0.5689, while the green innovation efficiency of declining cities is the highest, and the growth type is the lowest in the comprehensive planning cities. Second, based on spatial self-correlation in resource-based cities, the government support, and the influencing factors including the industrial structure and economic development, have positive impacts, while the environmental regulations and opening to the outside world will inhibit the urban green innovation. Therefore, to enhance the green innovation efficiency in resource-based cities, some suggestions include formulating differentiated development strategies, forming regional cooperation mechanisms, increasing government scientific and technological support, determining the reasonable intensity of environmental regulations, setting entry barriers for polluting enterprises, and optimizing industrial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaguai Yu & Zanzan Xu & Panyi Shen & Lening Zhang & Taohan Ni, 2022. "Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Green Innovation in Chinese Resource-Based Cities: Based on SBM-Undesirable and Spatial Durbin Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13772-:d:950916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeng, Shouzhen & Hu, Yingjie & Llopis-Albert, Carlos, 2023. "Stakeholder-inclusive multi-criteria development of smart cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wessam Krara & Ahmad Alzubi & Amir Khadem & Kolawole Iyiola, 2025. "The Nexus of Sustainability Innovation, Knowledge Application, and Entrepreneurial Success: Exploring the Role of Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Yu Zhang & Xi Cai & Yanying Mao & Liudan Jiao & Liu Wu, 2023. "What Is the State of Development of Eco-Wellbeing Performance in China? An Analysis from a Three-Stage Network Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Jinyu Chen & Dandan Zhu & Shijie Ding & Jingxiao Qu, 2024. "Government environmental concerns and corporate green innovation: Evidence from heavy‐polluting enterprises in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1920-1936, March.
    4. Zetian Cui & Yancheng Ning & Jia Song & Jun Yang, 2024. "Impact of National Innovative City Policy on Enterprise Green Technology Innovation—Mediation Role of Innovation Environment and R&D Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Xinxu Zhao & Kizito Uyi Ehigiamusoe, 2024. "A Study on the Evaluation and Determinants of Green Economic Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    6. Ling Hu & Tai-Wei Chang & Yue-Shi Lee & Show-Jane Yen & Chih-Wen Ting, 2023. "How Does Sustainable Leadership Affect Environmental Innovation Strategy Adoption? The Mediating Role of Environmental Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Bing Rong & Chentao Zhang & Shuhao Yang & Tongyi Liu & Chengjun Chu, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Green Development Progress Level of Private Enterprises in China: Based on Large Collection Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Yang Yang & Simo Li & Zhaoxian Su & Hao Fu & Wenbin Wang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Research on the Ecological Innovation Efficiency of the Zhongyuan Urban Agglomeration: Measurement, Evaluation and Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong Li & Qing Liu & Lei Wang, 2024. "An Index Model for the Evaluation of the Performance of Lock Navigation Scheduling Rules Considering the Perspective of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Wendi Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Erhua Zhang, 2023. "Fermatean Fuzzy IWP-TOPSIS-GRA Multi-Criteria Group Analysis and Its Application to Healthcare Waste Treatment Technology Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13772-:d:950916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.