Author
Listed:
- Seán R. O’Connor
(School of Psychology, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)
- Charlene Treanor
(Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)
- Elizabeth Ward
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)
- Robin A. Wickens
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)
- Abby O’Connell
(Exeter Clinical Trials Unit (EXECTU), University of Exeter, St. Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2LT, UK)
- Lucy A. Culliford
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)
- Chris A. Rogers
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)
- Eleanor A. Gidman
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)
- Tunde Peto
(Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)
- Paul C. Knox
(Department of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK)
- Benjamin J. L. Burton
(James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk NR31 6LA, UK)
- Andrew J. Lotery
(Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK)
- Sobha Sivaprasad
(NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V 2PD, UK)
- Barnaby C. Reeves
(Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU), University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK)
- Ruth E. Hogg
(Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)
- Michael Donnelly
(Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)
- MONARCH Study Group
Abstract
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a chronic, progressive condition and the commonest cause of visual disability in older adults. This study formed part of a diagnostic test accuracy study to quantify the ability of three index home monitoring (HM) tests (one paper-based and two digital tests) to identify reactivation in nAMD. The aim of this qualitative research was to investigate patients’ or participants’ views about acceptability and explore adherence to weekly HM. Semi-structured interviews were held with 78/297 participants (26%), with close family members (n = 11) and with healthcare professionals involved in training participants in HM procedures (n = 9) (n = 98 in total). A directed thematic analytical approach was applied to the data using a deductive and inductive coding framework informed by theories of technology acceptance. Five themes emerged related to: 1. The role of HM; 2. Suitability of procedures and instruments; 3. Experience of HM; 4. Feasibility of HM in usual practice; and 5. Impediments to patient acceptability of HM. Various factors influenced acceptability including a patient’s understanding about the purpose of monitoring. While initial training and ongoing support were regarded as essential for overcoming unfamiliarity with use of digital technology, patients viewed HM as relatively straightforward and non-burdensome. There is a need for further research about how use of performance feedback, level of support and nature of tailoring might facilitate further the implementation of routinely conducted HM. Home monitoring was acceptable to patients and they recognised its potential to reduce clinic visits during non-active treatment phases. Findings have implications for implementation of digital HM in the care of older people with nAMD and other long-term conditions.
Suggested Citation
Seán R. O’Connor & Charlene Treanor & Elizabeth Ward & Robin A. Wickens & Abby O’Connell & Lucy A. Culliford & Chris A. Rogers & Eleanor A. Gidman & Tunde Peto & Paul C. Knox & Benjamin J. L. Burton &, 2022.
"Patient Acceptability of Home Monitoring for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Reactivation: A Qualitative Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13714-:d:950048
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13714-:d:950048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.