IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13615-d948362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Self-Screening Intention among Saudi Female College Students: Utilization of the Health Belief Model

Author

Listed:
  • Nasser Shubayr

    (Department of Diagnostic Radiography Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
    Medical Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rola Khmees

    (College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ali Alyami

    (Department of Diagnostic Radiography Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Naif Majrashi

    (Department of Diagnostic Radiography Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nada Alomairy

    (Department of Diagnostic Radiography Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

  • Siddig Abdelwahab

    (Medical Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) screening is vital, as it is linked to a greater likelihood of survival, more effective treatment, and better quality of life. One of the most extensively applied models for conceptualizing probable barriers and facilitators to the adoption of desired health behavior is the health belief model (HBM). This study aimed to assess the impact of health perception and knowledge on breast self-examination intention (BSE) using HBM. HBM measures specific factors (perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers, benefits, cues to action, and self-efficacy) that impact one’s intention to use BSE. Data were collected from female undergraduate students ( n = 680) using a cross-sectional design, stratified simple random sampling, and a self-administered structured online questionnaire. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate our assumptions for students who intended to self-examine for BC. For demographic factors, we modified the multivariate model. Most respondents (93%) were under the age of 24 years. Female students from health colleges (48.5%), in their fourth academic year (42.6%), and from the southern region (57.6%) accounted for the majority of the sample. Respondents with a family history of BC were 9.7% of the total. Categories for age, college, region, residency, and BSE intention showed significant differences in their average knowledge scores. The survey revealed that 72.4% were aware of abnormal breast changes. Three constructs of the health belief model (perceived benefit, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy) are good predictors of BSE intention. Theory-based behavioral change interventions are urgently required for students to improve their prevention practices. Furthermore, these interventions will be effective if they are designed to remove barriers to BSE intention, improve female students’ self-efficacy, and enlighten them on the benefits of self-examination.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser Shubayr & Rola Khmees & Ali Alyami & Naif Majrashi & Nada Alomairy & Siddig Abdelwahab, 2022. "Knowledge and Factors Associated with Breast Cancer Self-Screening Intention among Saudi Female College Students: Utilization of the Health Belief Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13615-:d:948362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Brittany C. & Bowers, Jennifer M. & Payne, Jackelyn B. & Moyer, Anne, 2019. "Barriers to mammography screening among racial and ethnic minority women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Haya Salem & Suhad Daher-Nashif, 2020. "Psychosocial Aspects of Female Breast Cancer in the Middle East and North Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jyu-Lin Chen & Jia Guo & Qinyi Zhong & Yuanyuan Jiang & Honghui Zhang & Ping Mao & Qinyuan Huang & Chen-Xi Lin & Thomas J. Hoffmann, 2023. "Smartphone-Based Cancer and Obesity Prevention Education Program for Chinese Women (SCOPE): A Pilot RCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehab Hamed & Bayan Alemrayat & Mohamed Ahmed Syed & Suhad Daher-Nashif & Hadi Mohamad Abu Rasheed & Tanya Kane, 2022. "Breast Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices amongst Women in Qatar," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Wilding, Sarah & Tsipa, Anastasia & Branley-Bell, Dawn & Greenwood, Darren C. & Vargas-Palacios, Armando & Yaziji, Nahel & Addison, Caroline & Kelly, Phil & Day, Fiona & Horsfall, Kate & Conner, Mark , 2020. "Cluster randomized controlled trial of volitional and motivational interventions to improve bowel cancer screening uptake: A population-level study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    3. Julian I. Rauch & Joseph Daniels & Alyssa Robillard & Rodney P. Joseph, 2024. "Breast Cancer Screening among African Immigrants in the United States: An Integrative Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13615-:d:948362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.