IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13456-d945629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Unified Modeling Language to Analyze Business Processes in the Delivery of Child Health Services

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Pecoraro

    (Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Daniela Luzi

    (Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) has been increasingly used in recent years in the healthcare domain to analyze, optimize, harmonize and compare clinical and healthcare processes. The main aim of this methodology is to model the interactions between medical and organizational activities needed to deliver health services, measure their complexity, variability and deviations to improve the quality of care and its efficiency. Among the different tools, languages and notations developed in the decades, UML (Unified Modeling Language) represents a widely adopted technique to model, analyze and compare business processes in healthcare. We adopted its diagrams in the MOCHA project to compare the different ways of organizing, coordinating and delivering child care across 30 EU/EEA countries both from an organization and control-flow perspectives. This paper provides an overview of the main components used to represent the business process using UML diagrams, also highlighting how we customized them to capture the specificity of the healthcare domain taking into account that processes are reconstructed on the basis of country experts’ responses to questionnaires. The benefits of the application of this methodology are demonstrated by providing examples of comparing different aspects of child care.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Pecoraro & Daniela Luzi, 2022. "Using Unified Modeling Language to Analyze Business Processes in the Delivery of Child Health Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13456-:d:945629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Venera GEAMBASU, 2012. "BPMN vs. UML Activity Diagram for Business Process Modeling," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 637-651, December.
    2. Christos Vasilakis & Dorota Lecnzarowicz & Chooi Lee, 2008. "Application of Unified Modelling Language (UML) to the Modelling of Health Care Systems: An Introduction and Literature Survey," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 39-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel Cozgarea & Adrian Cozgarea, 2013. "Bpmn Patterns Used In Management Information Systems," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(15), pages 1-1.
    2. Kožíšek, František & Vrana, Ivan, 2017. "Business Process Modelling Languages," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13456-:d:945629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.