IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13041-d938903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Aleni

    (Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy)

  • Carmela Rinaldi

    (“Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
    UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
    Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Valentina Bettio

    (UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
    Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Eleonora Mazzucco

    (UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
    Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Annamaria Antona

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Cristina Meini

    (Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy)

  • Emiliano Loria

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Paolo Bonvicini

    (Biobanks and Complex Data Management, University of Cote d’Azur, 06108 Nice, France)

  • Silvia Vittoria Cracas

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Silvia Caristia

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Antonio Rimedio

    (Ethics Committee of the “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Faggiano

    (Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy)

  • Daniela Ferrante

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Daniela Capello

    (UPO Biobank, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
    Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy)

Abstract

Biobanks have established a critical role in biomedical research by collecting, preserving, organizing, and disseminating biospecimens and related health data, contributing to precision medicine development. Participation in biobanks is influenced by several factors, such as trust in institutions and scientists, knowledge about biobanking, and the consideration of benefit sharing. Understanding public attitudes, fears, and concerns toward biobanking is fundamental to designing targeted interventions to increase trust towards biobanks. The aim of our study was to investigate the level of knowledge and perception of biobanks in students and personnel of the University of Piemonte Orientale. An online questionnaire was designed and administered via e-mail. A total of 17,758 UPO personnel and students were invited to participate in the survey, and 1521 (9.3%) subjects completed the survey. The results showed that 65.0% of the participants were aware of the term “biobank” and knew what the activity of a biobank was, and 76.3% of subjects were willing to provide biospecimens to a research biobank, whereas 67.3% of the respondents were willing to contribute, in addition to biospecimens, their health and lifestyle data. Concerns were raised about the confidentiality of the information (25.6%) and the commercial use of the samples (25.0%). In conclusion, participants were aware of the role that biobanks play in research and were eager to participate for the sake of furthering scientific research. Still, several concerns need to be addressed regarding the confidentiality of the data along with the commercial use of the samples and associated data.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Aleni & Carmela Rinaldi & Valentina Bettio & Eleonora Mazzucco & Annamaria Antona & Cristina Meini & Emiliano Loria & Paolo Bonvicini & Silvia Vittoria Cracas & Silvia Caristia & Antonio Rimedi, 2022. "Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13041-:d:938903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Domaradzki & Jakub Pawlikowski, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-11, June.
    2. George Gaskell & Herbert Gottweis, 2011. "Biobanks need publicity," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7337), pages 159-160, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakub Pawlikowski & Michał Wiechetek & Anita Majchrowska, 2022. "Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Jan Domaradzki & Jakub Pawlikowski, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Abdelbaset Buhmeida & Mourad Assidi & Omar Alyazidi & Duaa Ibrahim Olwi & Ahmed Althuwaylimi & Fatimah M. Yahya & Leila Arfaoui & Leena Merdad & Adel Mohammad Abuzenadah, 2022. "Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Chen, Haidan, 2021. "Privacy in breast cancer biobank: Chinese patients’ perceptions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Noor A A Giesbertz & Annelien L Bredenoord & Johannes J M van Delden, 2012. "Inclusion of Residual Tissue in Biobanks: Opt-In or Opt-Out?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-6, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biobanks; survey; population;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13041-:d:938903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.