IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12685-d933084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Taxonomy to Systematically Identify and Describe Self-Management Interventions Components in Randomized Trials for COPD

Author

Listed:
  • Monique Heijmans

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Rune Poortvliet

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Marieke Van der Gaag

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Ana I. González-González

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jessica Beltran Puerta

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Carlos Canelo-Aybar

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Claudia Valli

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Marta Ballester

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Claudio Rocha

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Montserrat León Garcia

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Karla Salas-Gama

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Chrysoula Kaloteraki

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Marilina Santero

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Ena Niño de Guzmán

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Cristina Spoiala

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Pema Gurung

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Saida Moaddine

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Fabienne Willemen

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Iza Cools

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Julia Bleeker

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Angelina Kancheva

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Julia Ertl

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Tajda Laure

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Ivana Kancheva

    (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Kevin Pacheco-Barrios

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jessica Zafra-Tanaka

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Dimitris Mavridis

    (Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece)

  • Areti Angeliki Veroniki

    (Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
    Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada)

  • Stella Zevgiti

    (Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece)

  • Georgios Seitidis

    (Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece)

  • Pablo Alonso-Coello

    (Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Oliver Groene

    (OptiMedis, 20095 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Rosa Sunol

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Carola Orrego

    (Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
    Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, accurate comparisons of their relative effectiveness are challenging, partly due to a lack of clarity and detail regarding the intervention content being evaluated. This study systematically describes intervention components and characteristics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to COPD self-management using the COMPAR-EU taxonomy as a framework, identifying components that are insufficiently incorporated into the design of the intervention or insufficiently reported. Overall, 235 RCTs published between 2010 and 2018, from a systematic review were coded using the taxonomy, which includes 132 components across four domains: intervention characteristics, expected patient (or caregiver) self-management behaviours, patient relevant outcomes, and target population characteristics. Risk of bias was also assessed. Interventions mainly focused on physical activity (67.4%), and condition-specific behaviours like breathing exercise (63.5%), self-monitoring (50.8%), and medication use (33.9%). Support techniques like education and skills-training, self-monitoring, and goal setting (over 35% of the RCTs) were mostly used for this. Emotional-based techniques, problem-solving, and shared decision-making were less frequently reported (less than 15% of the studies). Numerous SMIs components were insufficiently incorporated into the design of COPD SMIs or insufficiently reported. Characteristics like mode of delivery, intensity, location, and providers involved were often not described. Only 8% of the interventions were tailored to the target population’s characteristics. Outcomes that are considered important by patients were hardly taken into account. There is still a lot to improve in both the design and description of SMIs for COPD. Using a framework such as the COMPAR-EU SMI taxonomy may contribute to better reporting and to better informing of replication efforts. In addition, prospective use of the taxonomy for developing and reporting intervention content would further aid in building a cumulative science of effective SMIs in COPD.

Suggested Citation

  • Monique Heijmans & Rune Poortvliet & Marieke Van der Gaag & Ana I. González-González & Jessica Beltran Puerta & Carlos Canelo-Aybar & Claudia Valli & Marta Ballester & Claudio Rocha & Montserrat León , 2022. "Using a Taxonomy to Systematically Identify and Describe Self-Management Interventions Components in Randomized Trials for COPD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12685-:d:933084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilda Bastian & Paul Glasziou & Iain Chalmers, 2010. "Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Paul P Glasziou & Iain Chalmers & Sally Green & Susan Michie, 2014. "Intervention Synthesis: A Missing Link between a Systematic Review and Practical Treatment(s)," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-7, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & Burgers, Jako & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2020. "Lost in definitions: Reducing duplication and clarifying definitions of knowledge and decision support tools. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 531-539.
    2. Blake M. Louscher & Veerasathpurush Allareddy & Satheesh Elangovan, 2019. "Predictors of Citations of Systematic Reviews in Oral Implantology: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    3. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mark J Bolland & Andrew Grey, 2014. "A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Shi, Xuanyu & Du, Jian, 2022. "Distinguishing transformative from incremental clinical evidence: A classifier of clinical research using textual features from abstracts and citing sentences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    6. Jason Portenoy & Jevin D. West, 2020. "Constructing and evaluating automated literature review systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 3233-3251, December.
    7. Tamara M. Haegerich & Corinne David-Ferdon & Rita K. Noonan & Brian J. Manns & Holly C. Billie, 2017. "Technical Packages in Injury and Violence Prevention to Move Evidence Into Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 78-108, February.
    8. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2019. "The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1288-1297.
    9. Joerg J Meerpohl & Florian Herrle & Gerd Antes & Erik von Elm, 2012. "Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-5, May.
    10. Lucy Turner & James Galipeau & Chantelle Garritty & Eric Manheimer & L Susan Wieland & Fatemeh Yazdi & David Moher, 2013. "An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    11. K. M. Saif‐Ur‐Rahman & Md. Hasan & Shahed Hossain & Iqbal Anwar & Yoshihisa Hirakawa & Hiroshi Yatsuya, 2022. "Prioritization and sequential exclusion of articles in systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    12. Tanja Burgard & Holger Steinmetz, 2023. "Evidence in management science related to psychology: benefits, tools, and an example of a community-augmented meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1135-1150, September.
    13. Laura Sheble, 2017. "Macro‐level diffusion of a methodological knowledge innovation: Research synthesis methods, 1972–2011," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2693-2708, December.
    14. Md Mahbub Hossain & Abida Sultana & Samia Tasnim & Qiping Fan & Ping Ma & E Lisako J McKyer & Neetu Purohit, 2020. "Prevalence of mental disorders among people who are homeless: An umbrella review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(6), pages 528-541, September.
    15. Costa, King & Ntsobi, Mfanelo Patrick, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Potential for Promotion of Southern Epistemologies in Educational Research: Ubuntu Philosophy as a Research Paradigm, a Conceptual Model," AfricArxiv qshp8, Center for Open Science.
    16. Means, Stephanie N. & Magura, Stephen & Burkhardt, Jason T. & Schröter, Daniela C. & Coryn, Chris L.S., 2015. "Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: Evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 100-116.
    17. Porjai Pattanittum & Malinee Laopaiboon & David Moher & Pisake Lumbiganon & Chetta Ngamjarus, 2012. "A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-6, November.
    18. Gillian L Currie & Helena N Angel-Scott & Lesley Colvin & Fala Cramond & Kaitlyn Hair & Laila Khandoker & Jing Liao & Malcolm Macleod & Sarah K McCann & Rosie Morland & Nicki Sherratt & Robert Stewart, 2019. "Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A machine-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-34, May.
    19. Melanie Lum & Luke Wolfenden & Jannah Jones & Alice Grady & Hayley Christian & Kathryn Reilly & Sze Lin Yoong, 2022. "Interventions to Improve Child Physical Activity in the Early Childhood Education and Care Setting: An Umbrella Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Tiago S. Jesus & Helen Hoenig & Michel D. Landry, 2020. "Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research Field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990–2017) and across Country Type," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12685-:d:933084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.