IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12660-d932799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Great Facilitation of Thirty Years of Reforestation with Mixed Species to Ecosystem Nitrogen Accumulation in Dry-Hot Valley in the Jinsha River

Author

Listed:
  • Zhilian Gong

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Yong Li

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Luqing Liu

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Shuang Deng

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

Nitrogen is a key factor influencing ecosystem structure and function in reforestation, but knowledge of ecosystem nitrogen accumulation through reforestation with mixed species is limited. Especially in the dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River, no studies cover total ecosystem nitrogen accumulation in mature plantations and its allocation for difficulty in collecting tree roots and deep soil from dry red soil. In this study, nitrogen accumulation of seven mixed plantations in the dry-hot valley in the Jinsha River was studied after thirty years of reforestation with an analogous sites method. The results were as follows: (1) Soil nitrogen stocks decreased with depth in the soil profile. Deep soil nitrogen storage (20–80 cm) was significantly correlated with stand age (R 2 = 0.752, p = 0.000; n = 7), accounting for 56–63% of total soil nitrogen storage and 43–47% of soil nitrogen accumulation in the dry-hot valley. (2) Total biomass nitrogen stock of the 30-year-old plantation was 1.22 t ha −1 , 61 times that of degraded wasteland and 7.6 times that of natural recovery shrub grassland, and it recovered to the reference level of natural forest following 30 years of reforestation. (3) Total ecosystem nitrogen stock in the 30-year-old plantation was 12.72 t ha −1 , 1.4 times the reference wasteland and 1.19 times the natural recovery shrub grassland. The contribution of soil nitrogen to ecosystem nitrogen storage and accumulation was 90% and 67%, respectively. Litter nitrogen accounted for 1.6% ecosystem nitrogen storage. It indicated that reforestation with mixed plantation of Leucaena leucocephala and other species greatly facilitated more ecosystem nitrogen accumulation, especially soil nitrogen (including deep compartment). Secondary biomass nitrogen, especially litter, could not be overlooked. This study filled the gap of ecosystem nitrogen storage and distribution during reforestation in the dry-hot valley. Mixed plantation with legume species such as L. leucocephala and other species and an important role of secondary biomass, especially litter in nitrogen accumulation, provided a reference for the strategy formulation of reforestation and forest nitrogen management in the dry-hot valley and other semi-arid or arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhilian Gong & Yong Li & Luqing Liu & Shuang Deng, 2022. "Great Facilitation of Thirty Years of Reforestation with Mixed Species to Ecosystem Nitrogen Accumulation in Dry-Hot Valley in the Jinsha River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12660-:d:932799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linhao Zhang & Haiping Tang & Peijun Shi & Wei Jia & Luwei Dai, 2023. "Geographically and Ontologically Oriented Scoping of a Dry Valley and Its Spatial Characteristics Analysis: The Case of the Three Parallel Rivers Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12660-:d:932799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.