IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p11975-d921796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Car-Following Behaviors under Different Conditions on the Entrance Section of Cross-River and Cross-Sea Tunnels: A Case Study of Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Zhang

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Feng Chen

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Yadi Huang

    (China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, Western Branch, Chongqing 400000, China)

  • Mingtao Song

    (Traffic Science and Technology of Guangdong Hualu Limited Company, Guangzhou 510420, China)

  • Xiao Hu

    (Shanghai Urban Operation (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200023, China)

Abstract

Compared to highway road tunnels, the entrance section of cross-river and cross-sea tunnels feature long and steep slopes. Along with a complicated traffic environment and harmful weather conditions, traffic congestion and rear-end crashes occur frequently during car-following in cross-river and cross-sea tunnels. It is necessary to examine the impact of traffic flow and weather conditions on car-following behavior at the entrance section of cross-river and cross-sea tunnels. To this end, this paper first extracted the vehicle speed data based surveillance video at the entrance of the Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel. Moreover, the actual average speed under different traffic flow conditions was obtained through the clustering algorithm, which was used as the basis for setting the experimental parameters. Then, in the driving simulation experiment, three traffic flow conditions (free flow, congested flow, and jam flow) were set up in three weather conditions (sunny, rainy, and snowy), and a risk situation was set up in each condition. Distance headway, time headway, acceleration, lateral offset, and driver’s emergency response time were collected. Moreover, seven slopes of 2% to 5% were set, and the relationship of slope on longitudinal speed and lateral offset was analyzed. ANOVA and post-hoc analyses were applied. The result indicates that traffic flow conditions have a significant effect on the car-following behavior, while weather conditions mainly influence the time headway. Moreover, drivers tend to adopt more cautious driving behavior as the distance between the vehicle and the tunnel entrance decreases. The results also show that the slope of the cross-river and cross-sea tunnel entrance section has a major influence on vehicle speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Zhang & Feng Chen & Yadi Huang & Mingtao Song & Xiao Hu, 2022. "Analysis of Car-Following Behaviors under Different Conditions on the Entrance Section of Cross-River and Cross-Sea Tunnels: A Case Study of Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11975-:d:921796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/11975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yizhi Wang & Jianming Hu & Li Li & Yi Zhang, 2014. "Optimal coordination of variable speed limit to eliminate freeway wide moving jams," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(09), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishi, Ryosuke & Watanabe, Takashi, 2022. "System-size dependence of a jam-absorption driving strategy to remove traffic jam caused by a sag under the presence of traffic instability," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:11975-:d:921796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.