IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11805-d918693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to SARS-CoV-2 Testing among U.S. Employers in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis Conducted January through April 2021

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto J. Caban-Martinez

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA)

  • Claudia Parvanta

    (College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA)

  • Naciely Cabral

    (College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA)

  • Cynthia K. Ball

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA)

  • Adrienne Eastlake

    (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA)

  • Jeffrey L. Levin

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA)

  • Kevin Moore

    (Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Ferguson College of Agriculture and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • Dalia Nessim

    (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA)

  • Ernie Stracener

    (Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Matthew S. Thiese

    (Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Paul A. Schulte

    (Advance Technologies and Laboratories International, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA)

Abstract

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. companies were seeking ways to support their employees to return to the workplace. Nonetheless, the development of strategies to support the access, use, and interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 testing was challenging. In the present study, we explore, from the perspective of owners and company leadership, the barriers to SARS-CoV-2 testing among U.S. companies. Key informant interviews with company representatives were conducted during January–April 2021 about SARS-CoV-2 testing. A pre-interview survey assessed respondent socio-demographic and organizational characteristics. Interview sessions were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using MaxQDA. A total of twenty interviews were completed with at least two interviews conducted in each major U.S. industry sector. Ninety percent of participants represented companies in business >10 years, comprising both small and large workforces. Using a grounded theory approach, six themes emerged: (1) access to and knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 tests; (2) strategies for symptomatic and asymptomatic testing of workers; (3) type/availability of personal protective equipment to mitigate coronavirus exposures; (4) return-to-work policies; (5) guidance and communication of SARS-CoV-2 Testing; and (6) use of contact tracing and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Various modifiable and non-modifiable challenges for SARS-CoV-2 testing among U.S. companies were identified and can inform work-related SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto J. Caban-Martinez & Claudia Parvanta & Naciely Cabral & Cynthia K. Ball & Adrienne Eastlake & Jeffrey L. Levin & Kevin Moore & Dalia Nessim & Ernie Stracener & Matthew S. Thiese & Paul A. Schu, 2022. "Barriers to SARS-CoV-2 Testing among U.S. Employers in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis Conducted January through April 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11805-:d:918693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank Fossen, 2021. "Did the $660 Billion Paycheck Protection Program and $220 Billion Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program Get Disbursed to Minority Communities in the Early Stages of COVID-19?," NBER Working Papers 28321, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maksim Belitski & Christina Guenther & Alexander S. Kritikos & Roy Thurik, 2022. "Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 593-609, February.
    2. Kristopher Deming & Stephan Weiler, 2023. "Banking Deserts and the Paycheck Protection Program," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(3), pages 259-276, August.
    3. Khlystova, Olena & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Belitski, Maksim, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1192-1210.
    4. Sabrina T. Howell & Theresa Kuchler & David Snitkof & Johannes Stroebel & Jun Wong, 2024. "Lender Automation and Racial Disparities in Credit Access," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1457-1512, April.
    5. Greenwald, Daniel L. & Howell, Sabrina T. & Li, Cangyuan & Yimfor, Emmanuel, 2024. "Regulatory arbitrage or random errors? Implications of race prediction algorithms in fair lending analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Aaron J. Staples & Thomas P. Krumel, 2023. "The Paycheck Protection Program and small business performance: Evidence from craft breweries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 931-956, October.
    7. Vijay Kumar & Hammam Alshazly & Sahar Ahmed Idris & Sami Bourouis, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on Society, Environment, Economy, and Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11805-:d:918693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.