IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11227-d908752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Industrial Carbon Emission in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Zhang

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Mufei Shen

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yupeng Luan

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Weijia Cui

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Xueqin Lin

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Climate warming caused by carbon emissions is a hot topic in the international community. Research on urban industrial carbon emissions in China is of great significance for promoting the low-carbon transformation and spatial layout optimization of Chinese industry. Based on ArcGIS spatial analysis, Markov matrix and other methods, this paper calculates and analyzes the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of industrial carbon emissions in 282 cities in China from 2003 to 2016. Based on the spatial Dubin model, the influencing factors of urban industrial carbon emissions in China and different regions are systematically analyzed. The study shows that (1) China’s urban industrial carbon emissions generally show a trend of first growth and then slow decline. The trend of urban industrial carbon emissions in the western, central, northeastern and eastern regions of China is basically consistent with the overall national trend; (2) In 2003, China’s urban industrial carbon emissions were dominated by low carbon emissions. In 2016, China’s urban industrial carbon emissions were dominated by high carbon emissions, and the spatial trend is gradually decreasing from the eastern region to the central region to the northeast region to the western region; (3) In 2003, the evolution pattern of China’s urban industrial carbon emissions was “low carbon-horizontal expansion” dominated by positive growth, and in 2016, it was “low carbon-vertical expansion” dominated by scale growth; (4) China’s urban industrial carbon emissions have spatial viscosity, and the spatial viscosity decreases with the increase of industrial carbon emissions. (5) In 2004, the relationship between urban industrial carbon emissions and gross industrial output value in China is mainly weak decoupling. In 2016, various types of decoupling regions are more diversified and dispersed, and strong decoupling cities are mainly formed from weak decoupling cities in southwest China and eastern coastal areas; (6) From a national perspective, indicators that are significantly positively correlated with industrial carbon emissions are urban industrial structure, industrial agglomeration level, industrial enterprise scale and urban economic development level, in descending order. Indicators that are significantly negatively correlated with urban industrial carbon emissions are industrial structure and industrial ownership structure, in descending order. Due to the different stages of industrial development and industrial structure in different regions, the influencing factors are also different.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Zhang & Mufei Shen & Yupeng Luan & Weijia Cui & Xueqin Lin, 2022. "Spatial Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Industrial Carbon Emission in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11227-:d:908752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cole, M.A. & Rayner, A.J. & Bates, J.M., 1997. "The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 401-416, November.
    2. Zhang, Weijie & Zhang, Ning & Yu, Yanni, 2019. "Carbon mitigation effects and potential cost savings from carbon emissions trading in China's regional industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Paul H. Malatesta & Kathryn L. DeWenter, 2001. "State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(1), pages 320-334, March.
    4. Hongbin Cai & Qiao Liu, 2009. "Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 764-795, April.
    5. Ren, Fang-rong & Tian, Ze & Liu, Jingjing & Shen, Yu-ting, 2020. "Analysis of CO2 emission reduction contribution and efficiency of China’s solar photovoltaic industry: Based on Input-output perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Danish & Recep Ulucak & Salah Ud‐Din Khan & Muhammad Awais Baloch & Nan Li, 2020. "Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade‐off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 813-822, July.
    7. Li Xie & Tengfei Wang & Tuo Zhang, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Intensity of Industrial Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Heterogeneous Subindustries," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1357-1374, May.
    8. Rehfeldt, Matthias & Fleiter, Tobias & Herbst, Andrea & Eidelloth, Stefan, 2020. "Fuel switching as an option for medium-term emission reduction - A model-based analysis of reactions to price signals and regulatory action in German industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Wang & Hui Ci & Ting Zhang & Yuxin Tang & Jinyuan Wei & Hui Yang & Gefei Feng & Zhaojin Yan, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Industrial Carbon Emissions in China’s Most Developed Provinces from 1998–2013: The Case of Guangdong," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Pu, Zhengning & Liu, Jingyu & Yang, Mingyan, 2024. "The effect of digital technology on residential and non-residential carbon emission," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Dan Wang & Yan Liu & Yu Cheng, 2023. "Effects and Spatial Spillover of Manufacturing Agglomeration on Carbon Emissions in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Wenliang & Yang, Mian & Duan, Hongbo, 2023. "Temperature and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Zhang, Peng & Deschenes, Olivier & Meng, Kyle & Zhang, Junjie, 2018. "Temperature effects on productivity and factor reallocation: Evidence from a half million chinese manufacturing plants," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-17.
    3. Qianqian Guo & Zhifang Su & Chaoshin Chiao, 2022. "Carbon emissions trading policy, carbon finance, and carbon emissions reduction: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1445-1480, August.
    4. Haikun Zhu, 2018. "Social Stability and Resource Allocation within Business Groups," Working Papers Series 79, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    5. Haoran Zhang & Rongxia Zhang & Guomin Li & Wei Li & Yongrok Choi, 2020. "Has China’s Emission Trading System Achieved the Development of a Low-Carbon Economy in High-Emission Industrial Subsectors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Bozec, Richard, 2004. "L’analyse comparative de la performance entre les entreprises publiques et les entreprises privées : le problème de mesure et son impact sur les résultats," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(4), pages 619-654, Décembre.
    7. Carlo Cambini & Yossi Spiegel, 2016. "Investment and Capital Structure of Partially Private Regulated Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 487-515, April.
    8. Cao, Chunfang & Li, Xiaoyang & Xia, Changyuan, 2021. "The complicit role of local government authorities in corporate bribery: Evidence from a tax collection reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Lu, Susan Feng & Dranove, David, 2013. "Profiting from gaizhi: Management buyouts during China’s privatization," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 634-650.
    10. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    11. Daniel Fiorino, 2011. "Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(4), pages 367-389, November.
    12. Saidi Kais & Ben Mbarek Mounir, 2017. "Causal interactions between environmental degradation, renewable energy, nuclear energy and real GDP: a dynamic panel data approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 51-67, March.
    13. Zhigang Qin & Wen Liu & Maonan Chen, 2022. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Diversification: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 3-21, March.
    14. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Pei-Ing Wu & Je-Liang Liou & Hung-Yi Chang, 2015. "Alternative exploration of EKC for $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions: inclusion of meta-technical ratio in quantile regression model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 57-73, January.
    17. Ang, James & Knill, April & Mauck, Nathan, 2017. "Cross-border opportunity sets: An international empirical study based on ownership types," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-26.
    18. Bortolotti, Bernardo & Fantini, Marcella & Siniscalco, Domenico, 2004. "Privatisation around the world: evidence from panel data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-2), pages 305-332, January.
    19. Gan, Tian & Jiang, Yan & Wu, Xi & Zhang, Mingxin, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and the cost of debt: Evidence from the Chinese bond market," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Li, Larry & McMurray, Adela & Sy, Malick & Xue, Jinjun, 2018. "Corporate ownership, efficiency and performance under state capitalism: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 747-766.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11227-:d:908752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.