Author
Listed:
- Vicente Faus-Matoses
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
- Vicente Faus-Llácer
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
- Tanaz Moradian
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
- Elena Riad Deglow
(Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain)
- Celia Ruiz-Sánchez
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
- Nirmine Hamoud-Kharrat
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
- Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho
(Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain)
- Ignacio Faus-Matoses
(Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the accuracy of endodontic access cavities created using an augmented reality appliance to those performed using the conventional technique. Materials and Methods: 60 single-rooted anterior teeth were chosen for study and randomly divided between two study groups: Group A—endodontic access cavities created using an augmented reality appliance as a guide ( n = 30) (AR); and Group B—endodontic access cavities performed with the manual (freehand) technique ( n = 30) (MN). A 3D implant planning software was used to plan the endodontic access cavities for the AR group, with a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D intraoral surface scan taken preoperatively and subsequently transferred to the augmented reality device. A second CBCT scan was taken after performing the endodontic access cavities to compare the planned and performed endodontic access for accuracy. Therapeutic planning software and Student’s t -test were used to analyze the cavities at the apical, coronal, and angular levels. The repeatability and reproducibility of the digital measurement technique were analyzed using Gage R&R statistical analysis. Results: The paired t -test found statistically significant differences between the study groups at the coronal ( p = 0.0029) and apical ( p = 0.0063) levels; no statistically significant differences were found between the AR and MN groups at the angular ( p = 0.6596) level. Conclusions: Augmented reality devices enable the safer and more accurate performance of endodontic access cavities when compared with the conventional freehand technique.
Suggested Citation
Vicente Faus-Matoses & Vicente Faus-Llácer & Tanaz Moradian & Elena Riad Deglow & Celia Ruiz-Sánchez & Nirmine Hamoud-Kharrat & Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho & Ignacio Faus-Matoses, 2022.
"Accuracy of Endodontic Access Cavities Performed Using an Augmented Reality Appliance: An In Vitro Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-10, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11167-:d:907832
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11167-:d:907832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.