IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10006-d887605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical and Microbial Leaching of Valuable Metals from PCBs and Tantalum Capacitors of Spent Mobile Phones

Author

Listed:
  • Asma Sikander

    (Department of Process Engineering, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Ulmenliet 20, 21033 Hamburg, Germany
    School of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of the Scotland, Scotland PA1 2BE, UK)

  • Steven Kelly

    (School of Health Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Scotland G72 0LH, UK)

  • Kerstin Kuchta

    (Institute for Environmental Engineering and Energy Economics, TUHH—Hamburg University of Technology, 21079 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Anika Sievers

    (Department of Process Engineering, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Ulmenliet 20, 21033 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Thomas Willner

    (Department of Process Engineering, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Ulmenliet 20, 21033 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Andrew S. Hursthouse

    (School of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of the Scotland, Scotland PA1 2BE, UK)

Abstract

We compared chemical and microbial leaching for multi-metal extraction from printed circuit boards (PCBs) and tantalum capacitor scrap. A mixed consortium of acidophiles and heterotrophic fungal strains were used in the experiments and compared to chemical leaching using specific acids (sulfuric, citric and oxalic acids). Under optimum conditions, 100% extraction efficiency of Cu, and nearly 85% of Zn, Fe, Al and Ni were achieved from PCB and tantalum capacitor scrap samples using sulfuric acid. The mixed consortium of acidophiles successfully mobilized, Ni and Cu (99% and 96%, respectively) while Fe, Zn, Al and Mn reached an extraction yield of 89, 77, 70 and 43%, respectively, from the PCB samples. For the tantalum capacitor samples, acidophiles mobilized 92% Cu, 88% Ni, 78% Fe, 77% Al, 70% Zn and 57% Mn. Metal mobilization from PCBs and tantalum capacitor scrap by A. niger filtrate showed efficient solubilization of Cu, Fe, Al, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn at an efficiency of 52, 29, 75, 5, 61, 21 and 35% from PCB samples and 61, 25, 69, 23, 68, 15 and 45% from tantalum capacitor samples, respectively. Microbial leaching proved viable as a method to extract base metals but was less specific for tantalum and precious metals in electronic waste. The implications of these results for further processing of waste electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE) are considered in potential hybrid treatment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Asma Sikander & Steven Kelly & Kerstin Kuchta & Anika Sievers & Thomas Willner & Andrew S. Hursthouse, 2022. "Chemical and Microbial Leaching of Valuable Metals from PCBs and Tantalum Capacitors of Spent Mobile Phones," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10006-:d:887605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Khaliq & Muhammad Akbar Rhamdhani & Geoffrey Brooks & Syed Masood, 2014. "Metal Extraction Processes for Electronic Waste and Existing Industrial Routes: A Review and Australian Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longsheng, Cheng & Ali Shah, Syed Ahsan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Ahmad, Munir & Ali, Sharafat, 2022. "An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1438-1453.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10006-:d:887605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.