IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9738-d882648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Nomogram Based on Initial Features to Predict BPH Progression

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo G. Luciani

    (Robotic Surgery Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Daniele Mattevi

    (Department of Urology, S. Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Daniele Ravanelli

    (Health Physics Unit, S. Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Umberto Anceschi

    (Department of Urology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Regina Elena, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Guido Giusti

    (Department of Urology, IRCCS S. Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy)

  • Tommaso Cai

    (Department of Urology, S. Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Umberto Rozzanigo

    (Department of Radiology, S. Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to establish a tool to identify patients at risk for pharmaceutical and surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) over a 10 year follow-up. Methods: The data of patients with mild to moderate male LUTS undergoing phytotherapy from January to December 2010 were reviewed. Patients were followed for 10 years through medical visits and telephone consultations. The outcomes were (1) treatment switch from phytotherapy or no therapy to alpha-blockers or 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), and (2) clinical progression (acute urinary retention or need for surgery). Two calibrated nomograms (one for each outcome) were constructed on significant predictors at multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 107 patients with a median age of 55 years at presentation were included; 47% stopped or continued phytotherapy, while 53% switched to alpha-blockers and/or 5-ARI after a median time of 24 months. One-third in the second group experienced clinical progression after a median time of 54 months. Age, symptom score, peak flow rate (Qmax), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and post-void residual volume were significantly associated with the outcomes. According to our nomograms, patients switching therapy or progressing clinically had average scores of 75% and 40% in the dedicated nomograms, respectively, as compared to 25% and <5% in patients who did not reach any outcome. Conclusions: We developed a nomogram to predict the risk of pharmaceutical or surgical interventions for BPH-related LUTS at 10 years from presentation. On the basis of our models, thresholds of >75% and >40% for high risk and <25% and <5% for low risk of pharmaceutical or surgical interventions, respectively, can be proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo G. Luciani & Daniele Mattevi & Daniele Ravanelli & Umberto Anceschi & Guido Giusti & Tommaso Cai & Umberto Rozzanigo, 2022. "A Novel Nomogram Based on Initial Features to Predict BPH Progression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9738-:d:882648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakub Marek Ratajczak & Anna Gawrońska & Margaret Fischer & Taras Hladun & Michał Marczak, 2022. "Can We Identify Patients in Danger of Delayed Treatment? Management of COVID-19 Pandemic Backlog in Urology Care in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9738-:d:882648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.