IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p8914-d869220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uptake, Engagement and Acceptance, Barriers and Facilitators of a Text Messaging Intervention for Postnatal Care of Mother and Child in India—A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Swetha Sampathkumar

    (Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill, University of Warwick, Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

  • Meenakshi Sankar

    (Buddhi Consulting Ltd., Lower Hutt 5011, New Zealand)

  • Sankar Ramasamy

    (Education Review Office, Wellington 6140, New Zealand)

  • Nivedita Sriram

    (UT South Western Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
    Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)

  • Ponnusamy Saravanan

    (Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill, University of Warwick, Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
    Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital, Nuneaton CV10 7DJ, UK)

  • Uma Ram

    (Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital, Chennai 600014, India)

Abstract

This study aimed to test the feasibility and to identify barriers and facilitators towards adherence of a text messaging intervention for postnatal care in India. Mixed methods research involving both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. A survey questionnaire for feasibility and focus group interviews to identify the barriers and facilitators to the intervention were conducted. The top three reasons for activation of service were: helped the new mother to understand the changes (95%); provided continuation of care (90%) and clarified conflicting information (89%). Over 90% read the messages daily. 80% were happy with the message frequency. About 75% shared the content with others. The main reasons for non-activation were: 30% had technical issues, 15% did not think it would be useful, 17% did not have time to activate and for 5%, husbands made the decision. These findings were triangulated through the qualitative focus groups. The main themes identified via the focus groups were: (1) reliable, current information; (2) issues and themes well aligned with new mothers’ needs and priorities; (3) expanded the repertoire of information sources available; and (4) high-quality accessible information. The satisfaction and trust rates were high. This technology may be useful for health information intervention in specific postnatal areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Swetha Sampathkumar & Meenakshi Sankar & Sankar Ramasamy & Nivedita Sriram & Ponnusamy Saravanan & Uma Ram, 2022. "Uptake, Engagement and Acceptance, Barriers and Facilitators of a Text Messaging Intervention for Postnatal Care of Mother and Child in India—A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8914-:d:869220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/8914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emilie S Ødegård & Lena S Langbråten & Andreas Lundh & Ditte S Linde, 2022. "Two-way text message interventions and healthcare outcomes in Africa: Systematic review of randomized trials with meta-analyses on appointment attendance and medicine adherence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandeep Inampudi & Eslavath Rajkumar & Aswathy Gopi & K S Vany Mol & K S Sruthi, 2024. "Barriers to implementation of digital transformation in the Indian health sector: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:8914-:d:869220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.