IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8805-d866976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Usability of IT Systems in Document Management, Using the Example of the ADPIECare Dorothea Documentation and Nurse Support System

Author

Listed:
  • Dorota Kilańska

    (Department of Coordinated Care, Medical University of Lodz, Kościuszki Street 4, 90-131 Lodz, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Ogonowska

    (Department of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya Street 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland)

  • Barbara Librowska

    (Department of Coordinated Care, Medical University of Lodz, Kościuszki Street 4, 90-131 Lodz, Poland)

  • Maja Kusiak

    (Department of Coordinated Care, Medical University of Lodz, Kościuszki Street 4, 90-131 Lodz, Poland)

  • Michał Marczak

    (Department of Management and Logistics in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya Street 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland)

  • Remigiusz Kozlowski

    (Center of Security Technologies in Logistics, Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, Matejki Street 22/26, 90-237 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Background: In 2016, an IT system was developed at MUL for the documentation of nursing practice. Preparing nursing students for the implementation of eHealth solutions under simulated conditions is crucially important for achieving the digital competencies necessary for health care systems in the future. Scientific evidence demonstrates that the use of an IT system in clinical practice shortens the time required for the preparation of documentation, increases the safety of clinical decisions and provides data for analysis and for the creation of predictive models for the purposes of HB HTA. Methods: The system was created through the cooperation of an interprofessional team at the Medical University of Łódź. The ADPIECare system was implemented in 2016 at three universities in Poland, and in 2017 a study of its usability was conducted using a questionnaire made available by Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society , “Defining and Testing EMR Usability MASTER V2 Final” on 78 nurses—students of MA in Nursing at Medical University of Łódź. Findings: Over 50% of the surveyed nurses indicated the usability of the system for the “effectiveness of documentation” variable. The same group of respondents had a positive attitude towards patient care planning with the use of the assessed system. In the opinions of the examined parties, positive opinions predominated, such as, e.g., “the system is intuitive”, “the system facilitates work”, “all patient assessments are in one place”, and “the time needed for data entry would be shortened”.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorota Kilańska & Agnieszka Ogonowska & Barbara Librowska & Maja Kusiak & Michał Marczak & Remigiusz Kozlowski, 2022. "The Usability of IT Systems in Document Management, Using the Example of the ADPIECare Dorothea Documentation and Nurse Support System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8805-:d:866976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumann, Lisa Ann & Baker, Jannah & Elshaug, Adam G., 2018. "The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 827-836.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Provenzano & Nicola Cillara & Felice Curcio & Maria Orsola Pisu & Cesar Iván Avilés González & Maria Francisca Jiménez-Herrera, 2024. "Electronic Health Record Adoption and Its Effects on Healthcare Staff: A Qualitative Study of Well-Being and Workplace Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Madhan Balasubramanian & Aliya Hasan & Suruchi Ganbavale & Anfal Alolayah & Jennifer Gallagher, 2021. "Planning the Future Oral Health Workforce: A Rapid Review of Supply, Demand and Need Models, Data Sources and Skill Mix Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Brigid M. Gillespie & Rachel Walker & Frances Lin & Shelley Roberts & Anne Eskes & Jodie Perry & Sean Birgan & Paul Nieuwenhoven & Elizabeth Garrahy & Rosalind Probert & Wendy Chaboyer, 2020. "Wound care practices across two acute care settings: A comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 831-839, March.
    4. Christine A. Sinsky & Adam Rule & Genna Cohen & Brian G. Arndt & Tait D. Shanafelt & Christopher D. Sharp & Sally L. Baxter & Ming Tai-Seale & Sherry Yan & You Chen & Julia Adler-Milstein & Michelle H, "undated". "Metrics for Assessing Physician Activity Using Electronic Health Record Log Data," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 50e1a11e7e664342a421de11e, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8805-:d:866976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.