Author
Listed:
- Teresa Magalhães
(Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
MTG Research and Development Lab, 4200-604 Porto, Portugal
TOXRUN—Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences, Advanced Polytechnic and University Cooperative (CESPU), CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal)
- Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
(Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
MTG Research and Development Lab, 4200-604 Porto, Portugal
TOXRUN—Toxicology Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences, Advanced Polytechnic and University Cooperative (CESPU), CRL, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal
UCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal)
- Tiago Taveira-Gomes
(Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
MTG Research and Development Lab, 4200-604 Porto, Portugal
Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa (FCS-UFP), 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)
Abstract
Real world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) plays an increasingly important role in clinical research since scientific knowledge is obtained during routine clinical large-scale practice and not experimentally as occurs in the highly controlled traditional clinical trials. Particularly, the electronic health records (EHRs) are a relevant source of data. Nevertheless, there are also significant challenges in the correct use and interpretation of EHRs data, such as bias, heterogeneity of the population, and missing or non-standardized data formats. Despite the RWD and RWE recognized difficulties, these are easily outweighed by the benefits of ensuring the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in complement to the gold standards of the randomized controlled trial (RCT), namely by providing a complete picture regarding factors and variables that can guide robust clinical decisions. Their relevance can be even further evident as healthcare units develop more accurate EHRs always in the respect for the privacy of patient data. This editorial is an overview of the RWD and RWE major aspects of the state of the art and supports the Special Issue on “Digital Health and Big Data Analytics: Implications of Real-World Evidence for Clinicians and Policymakers” aimed to explore all the potential and the utility of RWD and RWE in offering insights on diseases in a broad spectrum.
Suggested Citation
Teresa Magalhães & Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira & Tiago Taveira-Gomes, 2022.
"Digital Health and Big Data Analytics: Implications of Real-World Evidence for Clinicians and Policymakers,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-3, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8364-:d:858533
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8364-:d:858533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.