IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7806-d847787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Survey Results to a Decision-Making Matrix for Strategic Planning in Healthcare: The Case of Clinical Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Lavinia Bianco

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Salvatore Raffa

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Paolo Fornelli

    (Associazione Italiana per la Qualità della Assistenza Sanitaria e Sociale (ASIQUAS), Largo Konrad Adenauer 1/B, 00144 Rome, Italy
    Department of Social Sciences and Economics, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Salaria 113, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Rita Mancini

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Angela Gabriele

    (Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Frosinone District C and D, Via De Bosis-03043 Cassino, Via Piemonte, 03039 Sora, Italy)

  • Francesco Medici

    (Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152 Rome, Italy)

  • Claudia Battista

    (Department of Mental Health and Pathological Addictions, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) RM 6, Via Borgo Garibaldi 12, 00041 Albano Laziale, Italy)

  • Stefania Greco

    (Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Croce

    (Internal Medicine Unit, “G. Mazzini” Hospital, ASL 4 Teramo, Piazza Italia 1, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

  • Aldo Germani

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Simona Petrucci

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Paolo Anibaldi

    (Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Valerio Bianco

    (Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Mario Ronchetti

    (Associazione Italiana per la Qualità della Assistenza Sanitaria e Sociale (ASIQUAS), Largo Konrad Adenauer 1/B, 00144 Rome, Italy
    Department of Social Sciences and Economics, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Salaria 113, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Giorgio Banchieri

    (Associazione Italiana per la Qualità della Assistenza Sanitaria e Sociale (ASIQUAS), Largo Konrad Adenauer 1/B, 00144 Rome, Italy
    Department of Social Sciences and Economics, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Salaria 113, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Christian Napoli

    (Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
    Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

  • Maria Piane

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background: It is a well-known fact that the information obtained from a survey can be used in a healthcare organizational analysis; however, it is very difficult to compare the different results found in the literature to each other, even through the use of metanalysis, as the methodology is often not consistent. Methods: Data from a survey analyzing the organizational and managerial responses adopted in pathology-specific clinical pathways (CPs) during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic were used for constructing a decisional matrix, a tool called SPRIS system, consisting of four different sheets. The first sheet reports the results of the survey and, using a streetlight color system, identifies strengths and weaknesses; the second one, by assigning a priority score, establishes the priority of intervention on each of the strengths and weaknesses identified; the third sheet reports the subjective items of the questionnaire in order to identify threats and opportunities and their probability of happening; in the last sheet, a SWOT Analysis is used to calculate the performance index of the whole organization. Results: The SPRIS system, applied to data concerning the adaptation of four CPs to the COVID-19 pandemic, showed that, whereas all the CPs had a good performance index, some concerns remained unsolved and need be addressed. Conclusions: The SPRIS system showed to be an easily constructed tool that is able to give an overview of the organization analyzed by the survey and to produce an index that can be used in a direct quality comparison between different services or organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lavinia Bianco & Salvatore Raffa & Paolo Fornelli & Rita Mancini & Angela Gabriele & Francesco Medici & Claudia Battista & Stefania Greco & Giuseppe Croce & Aldo Germani & Simona Petrucci & Paolo Anib, 2022. "From Survey Results to a Decision-Making Matrix for Strategic Planning in Healthcare: The Case of Clinical Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7806-:d:847787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Paolo Roma & Stefano Ferracuti & Giovanna Da Molin & Giusy Diella & Maria Teresa Montagna & Giovanni Battista Orsi & Giorgio Liguori & Christian Napoli, 2021. "Knowledge and Lifestyle Behaviors Related to COVID-19 Pandemic in People over 65 Years Old from Southern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Antonella Arghittu & Marco Dettori & Emma Dempsey & Giovanna Deiana & Claudio Angelini & Angela Bechini & Caterina Bertoni & Sara Boccalini & Paolo Bonanni & Sandro Cinquetti & Fabrizio Chiesi & Maria, 2021. "Health Communication in COVID-19 Era: Experiences from the Italian VaccinarSì Network Websites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    3. I-Hui Chen & Shu-Fen Kuo & Yen-Kuang Lin & Tsai-Wei Huang, 2022. "Knowledge of and Barriers to Palliative Care Perceived by Healthcare Providers before and after Promotion of the Patient Autonomy Act: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Lois Orton & Ffion Lloyd-Williams & David Taylor-Robinson & Martin O'Flaherty & Simon Capewell, 2011. "The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Margaret Chan & Michel Kazatchkine & Julian Lob-Levyt & Thoraya Obaid & Julian Schweizer & Michel Sidibe & Ann Veneman & Tadataka Yamada, 2010. "Meeting the Demand for Results and Accountability: A Call for Action on Health Data from Eight Global Health Agencies," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    6. Macinko, J. & Silver, D., 2012. "Improving state health policy assessment: An agenda for measurement and analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(9), pages 1697-1705.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Lavinia Bianco & Mario Maninchedda & Benedetta Barchielli & Fabrizio Liguori & Giovanna Da Molin & Giorgio Liguori & Giovanni Battista Orsi & Stefano Ferracuti &, 2022. "How the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Impacted Daily Life? Assessing the Use of Web Resources for Recreational Activities in the Italian Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Tianzhen Hu & Li Li & Chuanxue Lin & Zikun Yang & Cheng Chow & Zhipeng Lu & Chen You, 2022. "An Analysis of the Willingness to the COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Shots among Urban Employees: Evidence from a Megacity H in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Brianne Riehl & Hisham Zerriffi & Robin Naidoo, 2015. "Effects of Community-Based Natural Resource Management on Household Welfare in Namibia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Marco D’Addario & Roberta Adorni & Patrizia Steca & Roberto Capelli & Francesco Zanatta & Francesco Fattirolli & Cristina Franzelli & Cristina Giannattasio & Andrea Greco, 2022. "Associations between Lifestyle Changes and Adherence to COVID-19 Restrictions in Older Adults with Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Paula Hooper & Sarah Foster & Billie Giles-Corti, 2019. "A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Hani Amir Aouissi & Ahmed Hamimes & Mostefa Ababsa & Lavinia Bianco & Christian Napoli & Feriel Kheira Kebaili & Andrey E. Krauklis & Hafid Bouzekri & Kuldeep Dhama, 2022. "Bayesian Modeling of COVID-19 to Classify the Infection and Death Rates in a Specific Duration: The Case of Algerian Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Carr-Hill, Roy, 2013. "Missing Millions and Measuring Development Progress," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 30-44.
    8. Benedetta Barchielli & Clarissa Cricenti & Francesca Gallè & Elita Anna Sabella & Fabrizio Liguori & Giovanna Da Molin & Giorgio Liguori & Giovanni Battista Orsi & Anna Maria Giannini & Stefano Ferrac, 2022. "Climate Changes, Natural Resources Depletion, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Russian-Ukrainian War: What Is the Impact on Habits Change and Mental Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Nancy Li & Markus Luczak-Roesch & Flavia Donadelli, 2023. "A computational approach to study the gap and barriers between science and policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 15-29.
    10. Cyr, Pascale Renée & Jain, Vageesh & Chalkidou, Kalipso & Ottersen, Trygve & Gopinathan, Unni, 2021. "Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 1054-1064.
    11. Susan L. Greco & Anna Belova & Jin Huang, 2016. "Benefits of Decreased Mortality Risk from Reductions in Primary Mobile Source Fine Particulate Matter: A Limited Data Approach for Urban Areas Worldwide," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1783-1802, September.
    12. Nicole Abaid & James Macinko & Diana Silver & Maurizio Porfiri, 2015. "The Effect of Geography and Citizen Behavior on Motor Vehicle Deaths in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Matthew Calver, 2016. "Measuring the Appropriate Outcomes for Better Decision-Making: A Framework to Guide the Analysis of Health Policy," CSLS Research Reports 2016-03, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    14. Marco Dettori & Paolo Castiglia, 2022. "COVID-19 and Digital Health: Evolution, Perspectives and Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-4, July.
    15. Courtney A. Cuthbertson & Don E. Albrecht & Scott Loveridge, 2017. "Rural versus urban perspectives on behavioral health issues and priorities," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 515-526, August.
    16. Heather Munthe‐Kaas & Heid Nøkleby & Sarah Rosenbaum, 2022. "User experiences of structured stakeholder engagement to consider transferability: The TRANSFER approach," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    17. Pierre-Olivier Bédard, 2015. "The Mobilization of Scientific Evidence by Public Policy Analysts," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, September.
    18. Edwards, Rachael C. & Kneale, Dylan & Stansfield, Claire & Lester, Sarah, 2024. "What are the mechanisms driving the early stages of embedded researcher interventions? A qualitative process evaluation in English local government," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    19. Amanda Glassman, Denizhan Duran, 2012. "An Index of the Quality of Official Development Assistance in Health - Working Paper 287," Working Papers 287, Center for Global Development.
    20. Pauline Zardo & Adrian G Barnett & Nicolas Suzor & Tim Cahill, 2018. "Does engagement predict research use? An analysis of The Conversation Annual Survey 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7806-:d:847787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.