IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6533-d825631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diet Quality, Dieting, Attitudes and Nutrition Knowledge: Their Relationship in Polish Young Adults—A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Jezewska-Zychowicz

    (Department of Food Market and Consumer Research, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW-WULS), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marta Plichta

    (Department of Food Market and Consumer Research, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW-WULS), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between diet quality, dieting, nutrition knowledge and attitudes in a group of Polish young adults. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2018 amongst 638 students of food and nutrition-related majors. Based on the frequency of consumption of 24 food groups, the “Pro-Healthy Diet Index” (pHDI) and “Non-Healthy Diet Index” (nHDI) were calculated. To assess the nutrition knowledge, the “GAROTA” test was used. The k-means clustering method was used to identify clusters-attitudes towards food and nutrition. The relationships between pHDI and nHDI indices, dieting, nutrition knowledge (NK), and attitudes towards food and nutrition were verified, using multiple linear regression analysis. The results confirmed some relationships between the variables. Higher nHDI characterized males ( p < 0.0001) and people with more unfavorable attitudes towards food and nutrition ( p < 0.0001), and those not using a diet ( p < 0.0001). Higher nutrition knowledge ( p < 0.0001) and higher BMI ( p = 0.0370) were correlated with lower nHDI. Higher pHDI characterized people with more favorable attitudes ( p < 0.0001) and those using a diet ( p = 0.0002). Nutrition knowledge showed an adverse association with nHDI ( r = −0.172, p < 0.05) and no association with pHDI. Thus, declarative nutrition knowledge does not seem to be a good indicator of healthy dietary behavior. Nutrition education programs that concentrate only on knowledge of facts, and neglect the development of favorable attitudes towards food and nutrition, may not be efficient enough to develop adequate dietary behavior of students.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Jezewska-Zychowicz & Marta Plichta, 2022. "Diet Quality, Dieting, Attitudes and Nutrition Knowledge: Their Relationship in Polish Young Adults—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6533-:d:825631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tali Heiman & Dorit Olenik-Shemesh, 2019. "Perceived Body Appearance and Eating Habits: The Voice of Young and Adult Students Attending Higher Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winnie Wing Man Ng & Anthony Siu Wo Wong & Kin Cheung, 2021. "A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Feasibility Study of a WhatsApp-Delivered Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating Habits in Male Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Blanca Villalobos & Horacio Miranda & Berta Schnettler, 2022. "Satisfaction with Food: Profiles of Two-Parent Families with Adolescent Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6533-:d:825631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.