IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6302-d821385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal Relation between Comprehensive Job Resources and Three Basic Psychological Needs at Work

Author

Listed:
  • Łukasz Baka

    (Social Psychology Laboratory, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Michał Szulawski

    (Social Psychology Unit, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, 02-353 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Monika Prusik

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Łukasz Kapica

    (Social Psychology Laboratory, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej Najmiec

    (Social Psychology Laboratory, Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This study aims to understand the long-term relation between comprehensive job resources and the three basic psychological needs at work (autonomy, relatedness and competence). The study was conducted in a progressive design on a sample of 1025 Polish human service professionals. Based on a typology of job resources, the three aggregated job resources index related to the task, leadership and interpersonal relations were created and the effects of each of them on the satisfaction and frustration of the three basic psychological needs, measured after 8 months, were tested. The analysis conducted by using of structural equation modelling showed that task resources are associated with the three basic psychological needs more strongly than two other kinds of resources and that that both leadership and interpersonal resources were related to the satisfaction and frustration of all the needs to the same extent. The results are discussed in the paradigm of the Conservative of Resources and the Self Determination theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Łukasz Baka & Michał Szulawski & Monika Prusik & Łukasz Kapica & Andrzej Najmiec, 2022. "Longitudinal Relation between Comprehensive Job Resources and Three Basic Psychological Needs at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6302-:d:821385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanne Berthelsen & Jari J Hakanen & Hugo Westerlund, 2018. "Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A validation study using the Job Demand-Resources model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mimi Moulik & V. N. Giri, 2024. "Job Crafting for Workplace Happiness: A Study of Millennials Across Indian Service Sectors," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(2), pages 242-260, April.
    2. LaJuan Perronoski Fuller, 2021. "Foundational Leadership Theory: A New Ethical Approach to Reducing Knowledge-Hiding Practices Among Employees," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(5), pages 67-76, September.
    3. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & An Ngoc Nguyen, Nguyen & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Ly & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing road safety compliance among food delivery riders: An extension of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 541-556.
    4. Łukasz Baka & Monika Prusik & Jan Hyld Pejtersen & Krzysztof Grala, 2022. "Full evaluation of the psychometric properties of COPSOQ II. One-year longitudinal study on Polish human service staff," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Margherita Zito & Emanuela Ingusci & Claudio G. Cortese & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Amelia Manuti & Monica Molino & Fulvio Signore & Vincenzo Russo, 2021. "Does the End Justify the Means? The Role of Organizational Communication among Work-from-Home Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Łukasz Baka & Dawid Ścigała & Krzysztof Grala, 2021. "Not All Demands Are Exhausted for Healthcare Workers. A Cross-Lagged Study on the Buffering Effect of Leadership Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6302-:d:821385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.