IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6116-d817928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Soundscape Appropriateness in the Vicinity of a Heliport in an Urban Park of Quito (Ecuador) Using Immersive Audio-Visual Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Virginia Puyana-Romero

    (Grupo de Investigación Entornos Acústicos, Departamento de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador
    Laboratorio de Fonética e Ingeniería Acústica, Instituto de Lingüistica Aplicada, Universidad de Cádiz, 11002 Cádiz, Spain)

  • José Luis Cueto

    (Laboratorio de Ingeniería Acústica, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Ismael Sebastián Caizapasto-Sánchez

    (Grupo de Investigación Entornos Acústicos, Departamento de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador)

  • Gabriel Eduardo Marcillo-Calispa

    (Grupo de Investigación Entornos Acústicos, Departamento de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador)

Abstract

Heliports are facilities that play a fundamental role in security and emergency operations. Since rotorcrafts do not need much space for take-off and landing, heliports are normally immersed in the urban fabric of our cities. However, they generate high noise levels, which can cause a nuisance, especially in outdoor areas intended for the recreation of citizens. This paper studies how helicopter noise affects the perception of the soundscape appropriateness and landscape quality in the vicinity of a heliport located in an urban park, using semantic differential scales and appraisals on the noise sources. The study area was the “Parque del Bicentenario” in Quito, Ecuador. Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) laboratory tests using 360-degree videos and spatial audio were preferred to on-site questionnaires, given the difficulty of predicting when helicopter noise events would occur. For the statistical analysis, objective acoustic and psychoacoustic parameters have also been considered. Results show that the soundscape is perceived as more pleasant and less chaotic when there is no helicopter noise. Furthermore, with the same visual stimuli, the appraisals of the landscape are much better in the scenarios without the helicopter noise. Sharpness is the psychoacoustic parameter that best explains the variance of the subjective variables evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Virginia Puyana-Romero & José Luis Cueto & Ismael Sebastián Caizapasto-Sánchez & Gabriel Eduardo Marcillo-Calispa, 2022. "Assessing the Soundscape Appropriateness in the Vicinity of a Heliport in an Urban Park of Quito (Ecuador) Using Immersive Audio-Visual Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6116-:d:817928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginia Puyana-Romero & Luigi Maffei & Giovanni Brambilla & Daniel Nuñez-Solano, 2021. "Sound Water Masking to Match a Waterfront Soundscape with the Users’ Expectations: The Case Study of the Seafront in Naples, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virginia Puyana-Romero & Angela María Díaz-Márquez & Giuseppe Ciaburro & Ricardo Hernández-Molina, 2022. "The Acoustic Environment and University Students’ Satisfaction with the Online Education Method during the COVID-19 Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6116-:d:817928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.