IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6106-d817659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ Perceptions and Outcome Measures after Undergoing the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Mixed-Method Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Feldman

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel 4066414, Israel
    Department of Physiotherapy, Central District, “Maccabi” Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv 5268104, Israel)

  • Yaniv Nudelman

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel 4066414, Israel
    Department of Physiotherapy, Central District, “Maccabi” Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv 5268104, Israel)

  • Sharon Haleva-Amir

    (School of Communication, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel)

  • Tamar Pincus

    (Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK)

  • Noa Ben Ami

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel 4066414, Israel)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome measures and perceptions of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) after being treated with the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI). In this process evaluation mixed-methods study, 30 patients with CLBP electronically completed self-reported measures (function, pain, and fear-avoidance beliefs) before and after ETMI treatment. Subsequently, each patient participated in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvements in function ( p < 0.001), pain ( p < 0.001), and fear-avoidance beliefs ( p < 0.001) after receiving ETMI treatment, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.234). Moreover, the average number of physiotherapy sessions was 2.6 ± 0.6 for the ETMI intervention, while the annual average number in Maccabi is estimated at 4.1 ± 1.5. Three main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) communication between the patient and the practitioner; (2) psychosocial treatment elements, and (3) ETMI as a long-term solution for CLBP. The findings of the current study highlight patients’ perceived need for an open and sincere dialogue and for receiving reassurance and encouragement about their LBP. Notably, they had no problem with the fact that they did not receive passive treatment. Accordingly, together with the significant improvement in post-treatment outcome measures, patients perceived the ETMI method as a practical tool for self-managing their back problems in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Feldman & Yaniv Nudelman & Sharon Haleva-Amir & Tamar Pincus & Noa Ben Ami, 2022. "Patients’ Perceptions and Outcome Measures after Undergoing the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6106-:d:817659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6106-:d:817659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.