IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p224-d711274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gait Improvement in Chronic Stroke Survivors by Using an Innovative Gait Training Machine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Patcharee Kooncumchoo

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Center of Excellence in Creative Engineering Design and Development, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Phuwarin Namdaeng

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Somrudee Hanmanop

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Bunyong Rungroungdouyboon

    (Center of Excellence in Creative Engineering Design and Development, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Kultida Klarod

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand)

  • Sirirat Kiatkulanusorn

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand)

  • Nongnuch Luangpon

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand)

Abstract

Chronic stroke leads to the impairment of lower limb function and gait performance. After in-hospital rehabilitation, most individuals lack continuous gait training because of the limited number of physical therapists. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a newly invented gait training machine (I-Walk) on lower limb function and gait performance in chronic stroke individuals. Thirty community-dwelling chronic stroke individuals were allocated to the I-Walk machine group ( n = 15) or the overground gait training (control) group ( n = 15). Both groups received 30 min of upper limb and hand movement and sit-to-stand training. After that, the I-Walk group received 30 min of I-Walk training, while the control followed a 30-minute overground training program. All the individuals were trained 3 days/week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome of the motor recovery of lower limb impairment was measured using the Fugl–Meyer Assessment (FMA). The secondary outcomes for gait performance were the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT), the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). The two-way mixed-model ANOVA with the Bonferroni test was used to compare means within and between groups. The post-intervention motor and sensory subscales of the FMA significantly increased compared to the baseline in both groups. Moreover, the 6 MWT and 10 MWT values also improved in both groups. In addition, the mean difference of TUG in the I-Walk was higher than the control. The efficiency of I-Walk training was comparable to overground training and might be applied for chronic stroke gait training in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Patcharee Kooncumchoo & Phuwarin Namdaeng & Somrudee Hanmanop & Bunyong Rungroungdouyboon & Kultida Klarod & Sirirat Kiatkulanusorn & Nongnuch Luangpon, 2021. "Gait Improvement in Chronic Stroke Survivors by Using an Innovative Gait Training Machine: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:224-:d:711274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:224-:d:711274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.