IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4640-d544414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2

Author

Listed:
  • David McConnell

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Conor Hickey

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Norma Bargary

    (Health Research Institute and MACSI, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland)

  • Lea Trela-Larsen

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Cathal Walsh

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Health Research Institute and MACSI, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland)

  • Michael Barry

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Roisin Adams

    (National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James’s Hospital, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland
    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, D08 HD53 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 continues to widely circulate in populations globally. Underdetection is acknowledged and is problematic when attempting to capture the true prevalence. Seroprevalence studies, where blood samples from a population sample are tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that react to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, are a common method for estimating the proportion of people previously infected with the virus in a given population. However, obtaining reliable estimates from seroprevalence studies is challenging for a number of reasons, and the uncertainty in the results is often overlooked by scientists, policy makers, and the media. This paper reviews the methodological issues that arise in designing these studies, and the main sources of uncertainty that affect the results. We discuss the choice of study population, recruitment of subjects, uncertainty surrounding the accuracy of antibody tests, and the relationship between antibodies and infection over time. Understanding these issues can help the reader to interpret and critically evaluate the results of seroprevalence studies.

Suggested Citation

  • David McConnell & Conor Hickey & Norma Bargary & Lea Trela-Larsen & Cathal Walsh & Michael Barry & Roisin Adams, 2021. "Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4640-:d:544414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geneletti, Sara & Mason, Alexina & Best, Nicky, 2011. "Adjusting for selection effects in epidemiologic studies: why sensitivity analysis is the only “solution”," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 31520, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Andrew Gelman & Bob Carpenter, 2020. "Bayesian analysis of tests with unknown specificity and sensitivity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1269-1283, November.
    3. Niels Keiding & Thomas A. Louis, 2016. "Perils and potentials of self-selected entry to epidemiological studies and surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(2), pages 319-376, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefania Paduano & Pasquale Galante & Nausicaa Berselli & Luca Ugolotti & Alberto Modenese & Alessandro Poggi & Marcella Malavolti & Sara Turchi & Isabella Marchesi & Roberto Vivoli & Paola Perlini & , 2022. "Seroprevalence Survey of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Population of Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toulis, Panos, 2021. "Estimation of Covid-19 prevalence from serology tests: A partial identification approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 193-213.
    2. Paul Allin & David J. Hand, 2017. "New statistics for old?—measuring the wellbeing of the UK," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 3-43, January.
    3. Glenn W. Harrison, 2017. "Behavioral responses to surveys about nicotine dependence," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S3), pages 114-123, December.
    4. Yingli Pan & Wen Cai & Zhan Liu, 2022. "Inference for non-probability samples under high-dimensional covariate-adjusted superpopulation model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 955-979, October.
    5. Panos Toulis, 2020. "Estimation of COVID-19 Prevalence from Serology Tests: A Partial Identification Approach," Working Papers 2020-54_Revised, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    6. J. N. K. Rao, 2021. "On Making Valid Inferences by Integrating Data from Surveys and Other Sources," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 242-272, May.
    7. Xiaojun Mao & Zhonglei Wang & Shu Yang, 2023. "Matrix completion under complex survey sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(3), pages 463-492, June.
    8. Rendtel, Ulrich & Alho, Juha M., 2022. "On the fade-away of an initial bias in longitudinal surveys," Discussion Papers 2022/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    9. Ashley L. Buchanan & Michael G. Hudgens & Stephen R. Cole & Katie R. Mollan & Paul E. Sax & Eric S. Daar & Adaora A. Adimora & Joseph J. Eron & Michael J. Mugavero, 2018. "Generalizing evidence from randomized trials using inverse probability of sampling weights," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1193-1209, October.
    10. Morrissey, Karyn & Kinderman, Peter & Pontin, Eleanor & Tai, Sara & Schwannauer, Mathias, 2016. "Web based health surveys: Using a Two Step Heckman model to examine their potential for population health analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 45-53.
    11. Lingxiao Wang & Barry I. Graubard & Hormuzd A. Katki & and Yan Li, 2020. "Improving external validity of epidemiologic cohort analyses: a kernel weighting approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1293-1311, June.
    12. Jiayin Zheng & Yingye Zheng & Li Hsu, 2022. "Re‐calibrating pure risk integrating individual data from two‐phase studies with external summary statistics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1515-1529, December.
    13. Claire Keeble & Stuart Barber & Graham Richard Law & Paul D. Baxter, 2013. "Participation Bias Assessment in Three High-Impact Journals," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    14. Takumi Saegusa, 2020. "Confidence bands for a distribution function with merged data from multiple sources," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 144-158, August.
    15. Panos Toulis, 2020. "Estimation of Covid-19 Prevalence from Serology Tests: A Partial Identification Approach," Papers 2006.16214, arXiv.org.
    16. David J. Hand, 2018. "Statistical challenges of administrative and transaction data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 555-605, June.
    17. Jae‐Kwang Kim & Siu‐Ming Tam, 2021. "Data Integration by Combining Big Data and Survey Sample Data for Finite Population Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 382-401, August.
    18. Cauane Blumenberg & Aluísio J. D. Barros, 2018. "Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(6), pages 765-773, July.
    19. Leonid Hanin, 2020. "Estimation of Population Prevalence of COVID-19 Using Imperfect Tests," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Saegusa Takumi, 2020. "Confidence bands for a distribution function with merged data from multiple sources," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 21(4), pages 144-158, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4640-:d:544414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.