IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4589-d543830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Sectional Study on Pharmacy Students’ Career Choices in the Light of Saudi Vision 2030: Will Community Pharmacy Continue to Be the Most Promising, but Least Preferred, Sector?

Author

Listed:
  • Dalia Almaghaslah

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulrhman Alsayari

    (Department of Pharmacognosy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mona Almanasef

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Amjad Asiri

    (Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Introduction: The Saudi Arabian healthcare divisions that recruit and hire pharmacists include hospital pharmacy, community pharmacies, universities, and research centres. Local studies showed that hospital pharmacy is the most preferred sector, while community pharmacy is the least preferred. However, jobs in hospital pharmacy are limited compared to community pharmacy. Hence, to accommodate the increasing numbers of pharmacy graduates and to facilitate the implementation of Saudi Vision 2030, which promotes primary healthcare and the participation of both private and non-governmental organisations in healthcare delivery, community pharmacy ought to be Saudised. This study was conducted to assess the career choices made by Saudi pharmacy students and the enablers that influence their career choice, especially in community pharmacy. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional approach was used. A total of 437 final year pharmacy students were recruited from 15 pharmacy schools around the country. Results: Salary and advancement opportunities as well as geographical location, benefits, and work environment were found to be “very important” enablers when making career decisions. Hospital pharmacy was selected as the most preferred sector by 242 (55.4%) of the participants, while community pharmacy was the least favoured pharmacy sector (17% or 6.2%). The enablers that might influence the consideration of a job in community pharmacy included career aspiration and social accountability. On the other hand, the barriers were personal beliefs about the sector and the nature of the work. Conclusions: The community pharmacy sector was found to be the least preferred sector to work in. The study revealed a list of enablers that the participants found to be relevant or of high relevance when choosing community pharmacy as a career pathway. Some of the enablers contribute to the role of the pharmacist towards the local community, social accountability, and towards the country’s Vision, such as interaction with the general public and educating them. Other enablers are related to the pharmacists’ career aspirations, such as owning a business. Some of the barriers that were found relevant include high workload, inflexible working hours, and limited opportunities for professional development. Localisation of community pharmacies would help to create more jobs for national pharmacists, increase the participation of female pharmacists in the workforce and support the achievement of Vision 2030. The barriers should be tackled on several levels: undergraduate curriculum, regulatory, and actual practice. Undergraduate education needs to include primary pharmaceutical care services in its curriculum. Regulatory changes include enforcing the renationalisation of the community pharmacy sector and permitting females to work in community pharmacies without location restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalia Almaghaslah & Abdulrhman Alsayari & Mona Almanasef & Amjad Asiri, 2021. "A Cross-Sectional Study on Pharmacy Students’ Career Choices in the Light of Saudi Vision 2030: Will Community Pharmacy Continue to Be the Most Promising, but Least Preferred, Sector?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4589-:d:543830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalia Almaghaslah & Abdulrhman Alsayari & Rayah Asiri & Najla Albugami, 2019. "Pharmacy workforce in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and opportunities: A cross‐sectional study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 583-593, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ola A. Mirdad & Ghada E. Esheba & Ahmed H. Mousa & Houriah Y. Nukaly & Yosra Z. Alhindi & Nahla H. Hariri & Nahla Ayoub & Safaa M. Alsanosi, 2023. "Over-the-Counter Medication Use among Parents in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4589-:d:543830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.