IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4356-d539529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Common and Unique Barriers to the Exchange of Administrative Healthcare Data in Environmental Public Health Tracking Program

Author

Listed:
  • Mikyong Shin

    (Environmental Public Health Tracking Section, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Charles Hawley

    (National Association of Health Data Organizations, Provo, UT 84606, USA)

  • Heather Strosnider

    (Environmental Public Health Tracking Section, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

Abstract

CDC’s National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) receives administrative data annually from 25–30 states to track potential environmental exposures and to make data available for public access. In 2019, the CDC Tracking Program conducted a cross-sectional survey among principal investigators or program managers of the 26 funded programs to improve access to timely, accurate, and local data. All 26 funding recipients reported having access to hospital inpatient data, and most states (69.2%) regularly update data user agreements to receive the data. Among the respondents, 15 receive record-level data with protected health information (PHI) and seven receive record-level data without PHI. Regarding geospatial resolution, approximately 50.0% of recipients have access to the street address or census tract information, 34.6% have access to ZIP code, and 11.5% have other sub-county geographies (e.g., town). Only three states receive administrative data for their residents from all border states. The survey results will help the Tracking Program to identify knowledge gaps and perceived barriers to the use and accessibility of administrative data for the CDC Tracking Program. The information collected will inform the development of resources that can provide solutions for more efficient and timely data exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikyong Shin & Charles Hawley & Heather Strosnider, 2021. "Common and Unique Barriers to the Exchange of Administrative Healthcare Data in Environmental Public Health Tracking Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4356-:d:539529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perlman, S.E. & McVeigh, K.H. & Thorpe, L.E. & Jacobson, L. & Greene, C.M. & Gwynn, R.C., 2017. "Innovations in population health surveillance: Using electronic health records for chronic disease surveillance," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(6), pages 853-857.
    2. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303813_1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Klompas, M. & Cocoros, N.M. & Menchaca, J.T. & Erani, D. & Hafer, E. & Herrick, B. & Josephson, M. & Lee, M. & Weiss, M.D.P. & Zambarano, B. & Eberhardt, K.R. & Malenfant, J. & Nasuti, L. & Land, T., 2017. "State & local chronic disease surveillance using electronic health record systems," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(9), pages 1406-1412.
    4. Patrick Saunders & Paul Campbell & Mark Webster & Michael Thawe, 2019. "Analysis of Small Area Environmental, Socioeconomic and Health Data in Collaboration with Local Communities to Target and Evaluate ‘Triple Win’ Interventions in a Deprived Community in Birmingham UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303874_8 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stolte, Allison & Merli, M. Giovanna & Hurst, Jillian H. & Liu, Yaxing & Wood, Charles T. & Goldstein, Benjamin A., 2022. "Using Electronic Health Records to understand the population of local children captured in a large health system in Durham County, NC, USA, and implications for population health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    2. Suliman Alghnam & Saleh A. Alessy & Mohamed Bosaad & Sarah Alzahrani & Ibrahim I. Al Alwan & Ali Alqarni & Riyadh Alshammari & Mohammed Al Dubayee & Majid Alfadhel, 2021. "The Association between Obesity and Chronic Conditions: Results from a Large Electronic Health Records System in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Abirami Srivarathan & Rikke Lund & Ulla Christensen & Maria Kristiansen, 2020. "Social Relations, Community Engagement and Potentials: A Qualitative Study Exploring Resident Engagement in a Community-Based Health Promotion Intervention in a Deprived Social Housing Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Aishwarya Venkat & Tania M. Alarcon Falconi & Melissa Cruz & Meghan A. Hartwick & Shalini Anandan & Naveen Kumar & Honorine Ward & Balaji Veeraraghavan & Elena N. Naumova, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Cholera Hospitalization in Vellore, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4356-:d:539529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.