IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i8p4179-d536587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Motivational Interviewing Make a Difference in Supporting Employees to Deal with Elevated Blood Pressure? A Feasibility Study at the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Michaelis

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
    Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Carmen Witte (née Farian)

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

  • Barbara Schüle

    (Occupational Health Service, Daimler AG, 70546 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Katrin Frick

    (German Academy for Psychology, 10179 Berlin, Germany)

  • Monika A. Rieger

    (Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Background : To overcome the problem of a high prevalence of undiscovered or untreated arterial hypertension in people of working age, the effects of behavioral change counseling in occupational health (OH) services should be investigated. The technique of motivational interviewing (MI) to support health-related lifestyle changes by physicians and/or occupational nurses (‘health coach’) has been shown to be successful in patients with chronic diseases. In 2010, we planned a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with employees who suffer from mild arterial hypertension. A preliminary feasibility study was performed in a large manufacturing company in Germany. Methods : All employees with elevated blood pressure measured by the OH-service were invited to undergo validation by 30 self-measurements. Persons with validated elevated values and without medical treatment received either usual hypertension counseling (control group, CG) or intensified MI-counseling (intervention group, IG) by the occupational health physician. Subsequently, the IG received MI-support from the ‘health coach’ in four telephone counseling sessions. Assessed feasibility factors included organizational processes, the acceptance of the validation procedure and the MI-counseling, and as primary outcome for an RCT the extent to which participants made health-related changes to their lifestyles. Results : Initially, 299 individuals were included in Study Part A (screening). At the end of Study Part B (intervention), out of 34 participants with validated and non-treated mild hypertension, only 7 (IG) and 6 (CG) participants completed the intervention including documentation. The high drop-out rate was due to the frequent lack of willingness to perform the 30 self-measurements at home with their own equipment. Acceptance was little higher when we changed the method to two repeated measurements in the OH service. MI-counseling, especially by the health coach, was evaluated positively. Conclusions : Despite the promising counseling approach, the feasibility study showed that an RCT with previous screening in the operational setting can only be implemented with high financial and personnel effort to reach an appropriate number of subjects. This substantial result could only be achieved through this comprehensive feasibility study, which investigated all aspects of the planned future RCT.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Michaelis & Carmen Witte (née Farian) & Barbara Schüle & Katrin Frick & Monika A. Rieger, 2021. "Can Motivational Interviewing Make a Difference in Supporting Employees to Deal with Elevated Blood Pressure? A Feasibility Study at the Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4179-:d:536587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelina Visram & Charlotte Clarke & Martin White, 2014. "Making and Maintaining Lifestyle Changes with the Support of a Lay Health Advisor: Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Health Trainer Services in Northern England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Steptoe, A. & Kerry, S. & Rink, E. & Hilton, S., 2001. "The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(2), pages 265-269.
    3. Martin Härter & Jörg Dirmaier & Sarah Dwinger & Levente Kriston & Lutz Herbarth & Elisabeth Siegmund-Schultze & Isaac Bermejo & Herbert Matschinger & Dirk Heider & Hans-Helmut König, 2016. "Effectiveness of Telephone-Based Health Coaching for Patients with Chronic Conditions: A Randomised Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy B Smith & Connor Workman & Caleb Andrews & Bonnie Barton & Matthew Cook & Ryan Layton & Alexandra Morrey & Devin Petersen & Julianne Holt-Lunstad, 2021. "Effects of psychosocial support interventions on survival in inpatient and outpatient healthcare settings: A meta-analysis of 106 randomized controlled trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Abu Siddique & Tabassum Rahman & Debayan Pakrashi & Asad Islam & Firoz Ahmed, 2020. "Raising COVID-19 Awareness in Rural Communities: A Randomized Experiment in Bangladesh and India," Munich Papers in Political Economy 09, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    3. Visram, Shelina & Walton, Nick & Akhter, Nasima & Lewis, Sue & Lister, Graham, 2020. "Assessing the value for money of an integrated health and wellbeing service in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Youn-Jung Son & Yaelim Lee & Hyeon-Ju Lee, 2020. "Effectiveness of Mobile Phone-Based Interventions for Improving Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Marita Stier-Jarmer & Cornelia Oberhauser & Dieter Frisch & Götz Berberich & Thomas Loew & Carina Schels-Klemens & Birgit Braun & Angela Schuh, 2020. "A Multimodal Stress-Prevention Program Supplemented by Telephone-Coaching Sessions to Reduce Perceived Stress among German Farmers: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Janet Yuen Ha Wong & Maggie Mee Kie Chan & Kris Yuet Wan Lok & Vivian Fei Wan Ngai & Michelle Tsz Ha Pang & Claudia Kor Yee Chan & Jessie Ho Yin Yau & Edmond Pui Hang Choi & Shirley Siu Ming Fong, 2017. "Chinese women health ambassadors programme: A process evaluation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2976-2985, October.
    7. John H Wasson & Lynn Ho & Laura Soloway & L Gordon Moore, 2018. "Validation of the What Matters Index: A brief, patient-reported index that guides care for chronic conditions and can substitute for computer-generated risk models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4179-:d:536587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.