IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3553-d526356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers of Occupational Safety Implementation in Infrastructure Projects: Gaza Strip Case

Author

Listed:
  • Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh

    (Civil Engineering Department, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Bassam A. Tayeh

    (Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza PO Box 108, Palestine)

  • Wesam Salah Alaloul

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Tronoh 32610, Malaysia)

  • Amro Fareed Jouda

    (Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza PO Box 108, Palestine)

Abstract

Infrastructure projects are the foundation for essential public services and have an influential position in societal development. Although the role of infrastructure projects is substantial, they can involve complexities and safety issues that lead to an unsafe environment, and which impacts the project key stakeholders. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the barriers to implementing occupational safety in infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip, which cause serious threats and reduce project performance. To evaluate the barriers, 39 items were highlighted and modified as per the construction context and environment, and which later were distributed in the form of a questionnaire, to get feedback from consultants and contractors. The analysis shows that in the safety policy barriers group, consultants and contractors both ranked the item “a contractor committed to an occupational safety program is not rewarded” first. In the management barriers group, consultants and contractors both ranked the item “safety engineer does not have significant powers, such as stopping work when needed” in the first place. In the behavior and culture barriers group, consultants and contractors both ranked the item “workers who are not committed to occupational safety are not excluded” in the first place. Overall, both consultants and contractors shared the same viewpoint in classifying the barriers in the working environment. The outcome of this study is beneficial for Palestinian construction industry policymakers, so they can monitor the highlighted barriers in on-going infrastructure projects and can modify the safety guidelines accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh & Bassam A. Tayeh & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Amro Fareed Jouda, 2021. "Barriers of Occupational Safety Implementation in Infrastructure Projects: Gaza Strip Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3553-:d:526356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catalão, Francisco Pinheiro & Cruz, Carlos Oliveira & Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda, 2019. "The determinants of cost deviations and overruns in transport projects, an endogenous models approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 224-238.
    2. Yılmaz, Fatih & Çelebi, Uğur Buğra, 2015. "The Importance of Safety in Construction Sector: Costs of Occupational Accidents in Construction Sites," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 25-37, April.
    3. Glorian Sorensen & Eve M Nagler & Pratibha Pawar & Prakash C Gupta & Mangesh S Pednekar & Gregory R Wagner, 2017. "Lost in translation: The challenge of adapting integrated approaches for worker health and safety for low- and middle-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahsan Waqar & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Wesam Salah Alaloul, 2023. "Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Pinheiro Catalão & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Joaquim Miranda Sarmento, 2023. "Public Sector Corruption and Accountability in Cost Deviations and Overruns of Public Projects," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1105-1126, September.
    2. Michael A. Flynn & Kolitha Wickramage, 2017. "Leveraging the Domain of Work to Improve Migrant Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-8, October.
    3. Diana Jaramillo & Lyndsay Krisher & Natalie V. Schwatka & Liliana Tenney & Gwenith G. Fisher & Rebecca L. Clancy & Erin Shore & Claudia Asensio & Stephane Tetreau & Magda E. Castrillo & Ines Amenabar , 2021. "International Total Worker Health: Applicability to Agribusiness in Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Yelena A. ALSHITS & Inna A. KULKOVA, 2018. "Effectiveness of Preventive Measures for Reducing Workplace Injuries and Occupational Diseases," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 18-25, April.
    5. Mostafa Namian & Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli & Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati & Sharareh Kermanshachi, 2022. "Are Construction Managers from Mars and Workers from Venus? Exploring Differences in Construction Safety Perception of Two Key Field Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Francisco Pinheiro Catalão & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Joaquim Miranda Sarmento, 2023. "The entanglement of time and cost deviations in public projects," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 241-272, March.
    7. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Matthews, Jane & Li, Xinjian & Fang, Weili, 2021. "A procurement policy-making pathway to future-proof large-scale transport infrastructure assets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A., 2021. "The ‘context’ of transport project cost performance: Insights from contract award to final construction costs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Bartlomiej Rokicki, 2022. "Cost Underruns in Major Road Transport Infrastructure Projects—The Surprising Experience of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3553-:d:526356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.