IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3400-d523872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Suicide Stigma and Associated Factors in Chinese College Students: Translation and Validation of the Stigma of Suicide Attempt Scale and the Stigma of Suicide and Suicide Survivors Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Wu

    (School of Marxism, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Research Center for Educational Neuroscience, School of Educational Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Research Center for Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zhenzhen Chen

    (College of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Philip J. Batterham

    (Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia)

  • Jin Han

    (Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia)

Abstract

This study aims to translate and validate two perceived suicide stigma scales, including the Stigma of Suicide Attempt Scale (STOSA) and the Stigma of Suicide and Suicide Survivor Scale (STOSASS) into Chinese language, examining the factor structure, and assessing the correlation between suicide stigma and a series of variables. After translating and back translating the STOSA and STOSASS, an online survey was administrated to 412 college students in China. These two scales were tested for their dimensionality in a series of confirmatory factor analyses. A series of regression analyses were conducted to examine the factors that are associated with perceived and public suicide stigma, including demographics, psychological distress, suicidality, suicide exposure, and perceived entitativity of suicide ideators, decedents, and survivors. The results showed that the two translated scales, STOSA and STOSASS, were reliable (Cronbach’s α = 0.79~0.83) and valid in Chinese contexts and it can be treated as unidimensional scales. Suicidality, exposure to suicide, and perceived entitativity of suicide-related persons were significantly associated with higher endorsement of public suicide stigma (SOSS Stigma, p < 0.03), but not perceived stigma (STOSA, STOSASS). Higher levels of psychological distress were associated with both higher perceived and public suicide stigma ( p < 0.05).

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Wu & Zhenzhen Chen & Philip J. Batterham & Jin Han, 2021. "Perceived Suicide Stigma and Associated Factors in Chinese College Students: Translation and Validation of the Stigma of Suicide Attempt Scale and the Stigma of Suicide and Suicide Survivors Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3400-:d:523872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shunyan Lyu & Yu Li, 2023. "The Roles of Endorsement and Stigma in Suicidal Ideation and Behavior among Chinese College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3400-:d:523872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.