IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p3244-d521324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sigmar Schnutenhaus

    (Centre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany
    Department for Dentistry, Clinic for Prosthodontics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany)

  • Anne Knipper

    (Centre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany)

  • Martin Wetzel

    (Centre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany)

  • Cornelia Edelmann

    (Centre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany)

  • Ralph Luthardt

    (Department for Dentistry, Clinic for Prosthodontics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany)

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether the process chain influences the accuracy of a computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedure. Four different data integration workflows using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), conventional impressions, and intraoral digitization with and without reference markers were analyzed. Digital implant planning was conducted using data from the CBCT scans and 3D data of the oral models. The restoration of the free end of the lower jaw was simulated. Fifteen models were each implanted with two new teeth for each process chain. The models were then scanned with scan bodies screwed onto the implants. The deviations between the planned and achieved implant positions were determined. The evaluation of all 120 implants resulted in a mean angular deviation of 2.88 ± 2.03°. The mean 3D deviation at the implant shoulder was 1.53 ± 0.70 mm. No significant differences were found between the implant regions. In contrast, the workflow showed significant differences in various parameters. The position of the reference marker affected the accuracy of the implant position. The in vitro examination showed that precise implantation is possible with the dynamic navigation system used in this study. The results are of the same order of magnitude that can be achieved using static navigation methods. Clinical studies are yet to confirm the results of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigmar Schnutenhaus & Anne Knipper & Martin Wetzel & Cornelia Edelmann & Ralph Luthardt, 2021. "Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3244-:d:521324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saverio Cosola & Simone Marconcini & Michela Boccuzzi & Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris & Ugo Covani & Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago & David Peñarrocha-Oltra, 2020. "Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Gerardo Pellegrino & Pierantonio Bellini & Pier Francesco Cavallini & Agnese Ferri & Andrea Zacchino & Valerio Taraschi & Claudio Marchetti & Ugo Consolo, 2020. "Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Luigi V. Stefanelli & George A. Mandelaris & Alessio Franchina & Nicola Pranno & Michele Pagliarulo & Francesca Cera & Fabio Maltese & Francesca De Angelis & Stefano Di Carlo, 2020. "Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Implant Supported Full Arch Prosthesis: A Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerardo Pellegrino & Giuseppe Lizio & Fabio Rossi & Lorenzo Tuci & Lorenzo Ferraioli & Luigi Vito Stefanelli & Stefano Di Carlo & Francesca De Angelis, 2021. "A 4 mm-Long Implant Rehabilitation in the Posterior Maxilla with Dynamic Navigation Technology: A Case Report after a Three-Years Post-Loading Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Alessio Franchina & Luigi V. Stefanelli & Fabio Maltese & George A. Mandelaris & Alessandro Vantaggiato & Michele Pagliarulo & Nicola Pranno & Edoardo Brauner & Francesca De Angelis & Stefano Di Carlo, 2020. "Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Eugenio Velasco-Ortega & Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra & Ivan Ortiz-Garcia & Jesús Moreno-Muñoz & Enrique Núñez-Márquez & Daniel Cabanillas-Balsera & José López-López & Loreto Monsalve-Guil, 2021. "Immediate Loading of Implants Placed by Guided Surgery in Geriatric Edentulous Mandible Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Camilla Preda & Andrea Butera & Silvia Pelle & Eleonora Pautasso & Alessandro Chiesa & Francesca Esposito & Giacomo Oldoini & Andrea Scribante & Anna Maria Genovesi & Saverio Cosola, 2021. "The Efficacy of Powered Oscillating Heads vs. Powered Sonic Action Heads Toothbrushes to Maintain Periodontal and Peri-Implant Health: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. So-Hyun Kim & Nam-Sik Oh & Hyo-Jung Kim, 2022. "Survival Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Implant Overdentures in Old and Medically Compromised Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Michael Korsch & Winfried Walther & Bernt-Peter Robra & Aynur Sahin & Matthias Hannig & Andreas Bartols, 2021. "Decision-Making in Implantology—A Cross-Sectional Vignette-Based Study to Determine Clinical Treatment Routines for the Edentulous Atrophic Mandible," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Francesco Grecchi & Luigi V. Stefanelli & Fabrizio Grivetto & Emma Grecchi & Rami Siev & Ziv Mazor & Massimo Del Fabbro & Nicola Pranno & Alessio Franchina & Vittorio Di Lucia & Francesca De Angelis &, 2021. "A Novel Guided Zygomatic and Pterygoid Implant Surgery System: A Human Cadaver Study on Accuracy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Se-Won Park & Ra Gyoung Yoon & Hyunwoo Lee & Heon-Jin Lee & Yong-Do Choi & Du-Hyeong Lee, 2020. "Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3244-:d:521324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.