IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p3095-d519098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Successful Aging Perception in Middle-Aged Korean Men: A Q Methodology Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Hyeon Seong

    (Department of Nursing, Chang Shin University, Changwon 51352, Korea)

  • Eunyoung Shin

    (Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Sohyune Sok

    (Department of Nursing, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the types of perception of successful aging in middle-aged men and to analyze and describe the characteristics of each type of successful aging perception of middle-aged men in South Korea. This study uses an exploratory study design, applying the Q methodology, which is a subjective research method. The participants were 25 middle-aged men (40 to 60 years old) living in C, Y, and B cities, which were P-samples that were judged to best reveal the successful aging of middle-aged men. In this study, principal component analysis of the PQ method program was used. The five perception types of successful aging among middle-aged men are Type 1 for the “leisure type”, Type 2 for the “mature type”, Type 3 for the “health-oriented type”, Type 4 for the “patriarchal type”, and Type 5 for the “family-centered type”. The mature type had the highest variance among the five types, and the leisure type was the type that showed the second-highest variance. In nursing practice, nurses need to pay attention to the successful aging perceptions of middle-aged Korean men for their successful aging in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Hyeon Seong & Eunyoung Shin & Sohyune Sok, 2021. "Successful Aging Perception in Middle-Aged Korean Men: A Q Methodology Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3095-:d:519098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shannon T. Mejía & Lindsay H. Ryan & Richard Gonzalez & Jacqui Smith, 2017. "Successful Aging as the Intersection of Individual Resources, Age, Environment, and Experiences of Well-being in Daily Activities," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 279-289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Wangare Njoroge & Dr. Amos Alumada Keya & Dr. Anne G. Wambugu, 2024. "Relationship between the Type of Retirement Transition and Marital Satisfaction in Kiambu County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1071-1083, April.
    2. Michal Isaacson & Ashwin Tripathi & Tannistha Samanta & Lisa D’Ambrosio & Joseph Coughlin, 2020. "Giving Voice to the Environment as the Silent Partner in Aging: Examining the Moderating Roles of Gender and Family Structure in Older Adult Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Massimo Piccirilli & Martina Pigliautile & Paola Arcelli & Irene Baratta & Serena Ferretti, 2019. "Improvement in cognitive performance and mood in healthy older adults: a multimodal approach," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 327-336, September.
    4. Bo Hu, 2021. "Childhood adversity and healthy ageing: a study of the Chinese older population," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 523-535, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:3095-:d:519098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.