Author
Listed:
- María L. Sánchez-Ferrer
(Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, “Virgen de la Arrixaca” University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar, Spain
Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, 30120 El Palmar, Spain
The first two authors contributed equally to this manuscript and should be regarded as joint first authors.)
- Ernesto De La Cruz-Sánchez
(Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Physical Activity, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, C/Santa Alicia, s/n, 30720 Santiago de la Ribera, Spain
The first two authors contributed equally to this manuscript and should be regarded as joint first authors.)
- Julián J. Arense-Gonzalo
(Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, 30120 El Palmar, Spain
Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Murcia School of Medicine, 30100 Espinardo, Spain)
- María T. Prieto-Sánchez
(Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, “Virgen de la Arrixaca” University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar, Spain
Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, 30120 El Palmar, Spain)
- Itziar Bernabeu-González
(Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, “Virgen de la Arrixaca” University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar, Spain)
- Ana Carmona-Barnosi
(Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, “Virgen de la Arrixaca” University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar, Spain)
- Jaime Mendiola
(Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Murcia School of Medicine, 30100 Espinardo, Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain)
- Alberto M. Torres-Cantero
(Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, 30120 El Palmar, Spain
Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Murcia School of Medicine, 30100 Espinardo, Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
Department of Preventive Medicine, “Virgen de la Arrixaca” University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar, Spain)
Abstract
To describe whether polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes vary in their body composition and skinfold (SKF) thicknesses and if they differ from women without PCOS, a preiminar case-control study was performed. A total of 117 cases were diagnosed using the Rotterdam criteria. Gynecological examinations and transvaginal ultrasound were performed in all women (266 women). Anthropometric measurements including SKF thickness were taken according to the restricted profile protocol of the international standards for the anthropometric evaluation according to the International Society of the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). Women with PCOS had higher body mass index and percentage of fat mass with respect to controls. The endomorphy component was also significantly higher in women with PCOS than in controls. Each PCOS phenotype displayed a different representation in the somatochart respect to the others phenotypes and also compared to controls. Women with PCOS had significantly higher ∑7 SKF ( p = 0.013), ∑appendicular SKF ( p = 0.017) and ∑arm SKF ( p = 0.019) than controls. H-O-POM phenotype had higher 7∑ SKF ( p = 0.003), ∑appendicular SKF ( p = 0.01), ∑arm SKF (0.005), ∑leg SKF, and ∑trunk SKF (0.008) and also a higher fast mass percentage than controls ( p = 0.011). In conclusion, body composition evaluated by ISAK protocol is different in women with PCOS, especially in the complete phenotype (H-O-POM). This could have relevant implications in terms of clinical evaluation and follow-up of these women, although more researches in this field are needed.
Suggested Citation
María L. Sánchez-Ferrer & Ernesto De La Cruz-Sánchez & Julián J. Arense-Gonzalo & María T. Prieto-Sánchez & Itziar Bernabeu-González & Ana Carmona-Barnosi & Jaime Mendiola & Alberto M. Torres-Cantero, 2021.
"Body Composition and Characterization of Skinfold Thicknesses from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotypes. A Preliminar Case-Control Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2977-:d:516770
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2977-:d:516770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.