IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p2866-d514998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Scientific Basis for Occupational Exposure Limits for Hydrogen Sulphide—A Critical Commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Elwood

    (Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

Abstract

Objectives: Occupational exposure limits for hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) vary considerably; three expert group reports, published from 2006 to 2010, each recommend different limits. Some jurisdictions are considering substantial reductions. Methods: This review assesses the scientific evidence used in these recommendations and presents a new systematic review of human studies from 2006–20, identifying 33 studies. Results: The three major reports all give most weight to two sets of studies: of physiological effects in human volunteers, and of effects in the nasal passages of rats and mice. The human studies were done in one laboratory over 20 years ago and give inconsistent results. The breathing style and nasal anatomy of rats and mice would make them more sensitive than humans to inhaled agents. Each expert group applied different uncertainly factors. From these reports and the further literature review, no clear evidence of detrimental health effects from chronic occupational exposures specific to H 2 S was found. Detailed studies of individuals in communities with natural sources in New Zealand have shown no detrimental effects. Studies in Iceland and Italy show some associations; these and various other small studies need verification. Conclusions: The scientific justification for lowering occupational exposure limits is very limited. There is no clear evidence, based on currently available studies, that lower limits will protect the health of workers further than will the current exposure limits used in most countries. Further review and assessment of relevant evidence is justified before exposure limits are set.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Elwood, 2021. "The Scientific Basis for Occupational Exposure Limits for Hydrogen Sulphide—A Critical Commentary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2866-:d:514998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael N Bates & Julian Crane & John R Balmes & Nick Garrett, 2015. "Investigation of Hydrogen Sulfide Exposure and Lung Function, Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Geothermal Area of New Zealand," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Malinauskaite, Laura, 2020. "A cascade model and initial exploration of co-production processes underpinning the ecosystem services of geothermal areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 917-927.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2866-:d:514998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.