IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p2788-d513969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Older Users of a Befriending Service in Ireland and the Maintenance of Personal Autonomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Eimile Holton

    (School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Rachel Fitzpatrick

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

  • Rebecca Maguire

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

  • Seán Commins

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

  • Thomas Scharf

    (Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Brian Lawlor

    (School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Natalie Johnson

    (ALONE, Dublin 8 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Caoimhe Hannigan

    (School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2 Dublin, Ireland
    National College, Ireland School of Business, Dublin 1 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Joanna McHugh Power

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

Abstract

In the Republic of Ireland (RoI), COVID-19 public health guidelines have been most restrictive for people aged 70 and over. Such individuals are most likely to avail of befriending services offered by a network of Irish organisations. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of COVID-19 guidelines on befriending service users, and to develop recommended adaptations to befriending services compatible with such guidelines. A qualitative constructivist grounded theory approach was taken to the study design and analysis, using semi-structured interviews to collect data from 11 participants by telephone between May 2020 and January 2021. Results show a grounded theory describing how older users of a befriending service maintained their personal autonomy in the face of strict government guidelines. Participants described living life as usual, often contravening guidelines, and how they chose to adapt to the situation, yielding both positive and negative outcomes. Some potential adaptations were discussed to the befriending service (including a preserved focus on the social and emotional functions of the befriending relationship, and the accommodation of collaborative decision making about communicative alternatives), but ultimately it was made clear that participants would tailor the services to their own preferences. Results have implications for befriending service design and delivery, and for public health officials who wish to support the health of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Eimile Holton & Rachel Fitzpatrick & Rebecca Maguire & Seán Commins & Thomas Scharf & Brian Lawlor & Natalie Johnson & Caoimhe Hannigan & Joanna McHugh Power, 2021. "Older Users of a Befriending Service in Ireland and the Maintenance of Personal Autonomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2788-:d:513969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jakob D’herde & Wesley Gruijthuijsen & Dominique Vanneste & Veerle Draulans & Hilde Heynen, 2021. "“I Could Not Manage This Long-Term, Absolutely Not.” Aging in Place, Informal Care, COVID-19, and the Neighborhood in Flanders (Belgium)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2788-:d:513969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.