IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2456-d509153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The P.I.N.K. Study Approach for Supporting Personalized Risk Assessment and Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Franchini

    (Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Stefania Pieroni

    (Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Edgardo Montrucchio

    (Senologica SrL, 19124 La Spezia, Italy)

  • Jacopo Nori Cucchiari

    (Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50139 Firenze, Italy)

  • Cosimo Di Maggio

    (Studimed Cadorna Srl, 35123 Padova, Italy)

  • Enrico Cassano

    (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy)

  • Brunella Di Nubila

    (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy)

  • Gian Marco Giuseppetti

    (Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ancona, 60030 Ancona, Italy)

  • Alberto Nicolucci

    (Studi Michelangelo SrL, 50129 Firenze, Italy)

  • Gianfranco Scaperrotta

    (Istituto Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Paolo Belli

    (F. Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Sonia Santicchia

    (AUSL della Romagna Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica, 47923 Rimini, Italy)

  • Sabrina Molinaro

    (Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • on behalf of the PINK Consortium

    (Membership of the PINK Consortium is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

Abstract

Breast cancer is a clear example of excellent survival when it is detected and properly treated in the early stage. Currently, screening of this cancer relies on mammography, which may be integrated by new imaging techniques for more exhaustive evaluation. The Personalized, Integrated, Network, Knowledge (P.I.N.K.) study is a longitudinal multicentric study involving several diagnostic centres across Italy, co-ordinated by the Italian National Research Council and co-funded by the Umberto Veronesi Foundation. Aim of the study is to evaluate the increased diagnostic accuracy in detecting cancers obtained with different combinations of imaging technologies, and find the most effective diagnostic pathway matching the characteristics of an individual patient. The study foresees the enrolment of 50,000 women over the age of 40 years presenting for breast examination and providing informed consent to data handling. So far, the 15 participating centres across Italy have recruited a total of 22,848 patients. Based on the analyses of the first 175 histopathological-proven breast cancers, mammographic sensitivity was estimated to be 61.7% ( n = 108 cancers), whereas diagnostic accuracy increased by 35.5% ( n = 44 cancers) when mammography was integrated with other imaging modalities (ultrasound and/or digital breast tomosynthesis). Increase was mainly determined by ultrasound alone. Given the ongoing data collection and recruitment, the number of cancers detected is too low to allow any further in-depth analysis to explore links to patient characteristics. Past studies show that the uniform approach of population screening guidelines should be revised in favour of more personalised regimens, where known standards are integrated by imaging techniques most suitable for the individual’s characteristics. With the ultimate goal of identifying early breast cancer detection strategies, our preliminary results suggest that integrated diagnostic approach could lead to a paradigm shift from an age-based regimen toward more specific and effective risk-based personalised screening regimens, in order to reduce mortality from breast cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Franchini & Stefania Pieroni & Edgardo Montrucchio & Jacopo Nori Cucchiari & Cosimo Di Maggio & Enrico Cassano & Brunella Di Nubila & Gian Marco Giuseppetti & Alberto Nicolucci & Gianfranco Sc, 2021. "The P.I.N.K. Study Approach for Supporting Personalized Risk Assessment and Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2456-:d:509153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Sun & Rosa Legood & Isabel dos-Santos-Silva & Shivani Mathur Gaiha & Zia Sadique, 2018. "Global treatment costs of breast cancer by stage: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofmarcher, Thomas & Lindgren, Peter & Wilking, Nils, 2022. "Cancer Care in Türkiye in a European Context," IHE Report / IHE Rapport 2022:10, IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics.
    2. Iasmina Petrovici & Mihaela Ionica & Octavian C. Neagoe, 2021. "Economic Crisis: A Factor for the Delayed Diagnosis of Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Alfredo Palacios & Carlos Rojas-Roque & Lucas González & Ariel Bardach & Agustín Ciapponi & Claudia Peckaitis & Andres Pichon-Riviere & Federico Augustovski, 2021. "Direct Medical Costs, Productivity Loss Costs and Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures in Women with Breast Cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 485-502, May.
    4. Lorna Wills & Diana Nagarwalla & Clare Pearson & Sean McPhail & Rose Hinchliffe & Ben Sharpless & Fahmina Fardus-Reid & Lyndsy Ambler & Samantha Harrison & Jon Shelton, 2024. "Estimating surgery, radiotherapy and systemic anti-cancer therapy treatment costs for cancer patients by stage at diagnosis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(5), pages 763-774, July.
    5. Ian Grady & Sean Grady & Nailya Chanisheva, 2021. "Long-term cost of breast cancer treatment to the United States Medicare Program by stage at diagnosis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(9), pages 1365-1370, December.
    6. Francesco Saverio Mennini & Marco Trabucco Aurilio & Simone Gazzillo & Claudia Nardone & Paolo Sciattella & Andrea Marcellusi & Raffaele Migliorini & Valerio Sciannamea & Andrea Piccioni & Matteo Bolc, 2021. "An Analysis of the Social and Economic Costs of Breast Cancer in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Chunhuan Lao & Mohana Mondal & Marion Kuper-Hommel & Ian Campbell & Ross Lawrenson, 2022. "Differences in Breast Cancer Costs by Cancer Stage and Biomarker Subtype in New Zealand," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 539-548, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2456-:d:509153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.