IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2377-d508155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do We Assess Patient Skills in a Competence-Based Program? Assessment of Patient Competences Using the Spanish Version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire and Real Practical Cases in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain)

  • Beatriz Arranz-Martín

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain)

  • Beatriz Navarro-Brazález

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain)

  • Fernando Vergara-Pérez

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier Bailón-Cerezo

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Physiotherapy, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Torres-Lacomba

    (Physiotherapy in Women’s Health Research Group, Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Therapeutic patient education programs must assess the competences that patients achieve. Evaluation in the pedagogical domain ensures that learning has taken place among patients. The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) is a tool for assessing patient knowledge about urinary (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) conditions. The aim of this study was to translate the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) into Spanish and test its measurement properties, as well as propose real practical cases as a competence assessment tool. The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted by a standardized translation/back-translation method. Measurement properties analysis was performed by assessing the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability. A total of 275 women were recruited. The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences in the PIKQ scores between patients and expert groups. Cronbach’s alpha revealed good internal consistency. The test–retest reliability showed excellent correlation with UI and POP scales. Regarding responsiveness, the effect size, and standardized response mean demonstrated excellent values. No floor or ceiling effects were shown. In addition, three “real practical cases” evaluating skills in identifying and analyzing, decision making, and problem-solving were developed and tested. The Spanish PIKQ is a comprehensible, valid, reliable, and responsive tool for the Spanish population. Real practical cases are useful competence assessment tools that are well accepted by women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD), improving their understanding and their decision-making regarding PFD.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez & Beatriz Arranz-Martín & Beatriz Navarro-Brazález & Fernando Vergara-Pérez & Javier Bailón-Cerezo & María Torres-Lacomba, 2021. "How Do We Assess Patient Skills in a Competence-Based Program? Assessment of Patient Competences Using the Spanish Version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire and Real Practical C," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2377-:d:508155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lara Díaz-Álvarez & Laura Lorenzo-Gallego & Helena Romay-Barrero & Virginia Prieto-Gómez & María Torres-Lacomba & Beatriz Navarro-Brazález, 2022. "Does the Contractile Capability of Pelvic Floor Muscles Improve with Knowledge Acquisition and Verbal Instructions in Healthy Women? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Marina Guallar-Bouloc & Paloma Gómez-Bueno & Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez & Guadalupe Molina-Torres & Rafael Lomas-Vega & Alejandro Galán-Mercant, 2021. "Spanish Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Women: A Systematic Review of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Andrea Vicente-Neira & Virginia Prieto-Gómez & Beatriz Navarro-Brazález & Cristina Lirio-Romero & Javier Bailón-Cerezo & María Torres-Lacomba, 2022. "Online Information on Painful Sexual Dysfunction in Women: Quality Analysis of Websites in SPANISH about Dyspareunia, Vaginismus and Vulvodynia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. María Torres-Lacomba & Beatriz Navarro-Brazález & Javier Bailón-Cerezo & Fernando Vergara-Pérez & Irene de la Rosa-Díaz & Virginia Prieto-Gómez, 2021. "Assessment Tools of Patient Competences: The Spanish Version of the R-NPQ and Three Practical Cases in Women with Breast Cancer and Persistent Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2377-:d:508155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.