IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i5p2216-d504808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and Acceptability of Accelerometer Measurement of Physical Activity in Pregnant Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Emma L. M. Clark

    (Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Lauren D. Gulley

    (Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Allison M. Hilkin

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Bonny Rockette-Wagner

    (Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA)

  • Heather J. Leach

    (Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson

    (Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Marian Tanofsky-Kraff

    (Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Kristen J. Nadeau

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Stephen M. Scott

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Jeanelle L. Sheeder

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

  • Lauren B. Shomaker

    (Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA)

Abstract

During pregnancy, physical activity relates to better maternal and child mental and physical health. Accelerometry is thought to be effective for assessing free-living physical activity, but the feasibility/acceptability of accelerometer use in pregnant adolescents has not been reported. In this short communication, we conducted secondary analysis of a small pilot study to describe the feasibility/acceptability of accelerometry in pregnant adolescents and the preliminary results of physical activity characteristics. Participants were recruited from a multidisciplinary adolescent perinatal clinic. Physical activity was assessed with wrist-worn accelerometers. Feasibility was described as median days of valid wear (≥10 h of wear/day) for the total sample and the number/percentage of participants with ≥4 days of valid wear. Sensitivity analyses of wear time were performed. Acceptability ratings were collected by structured interview. Thirty-six pregnant (14.6 ± 2.1 gestational weeks) adolescents (17.9 ± 1.0 years) participated. Median days of valid wear were 4 days. Seventeen participants (51.5%) had ≥4 days of valid wear. There were no differences in characteristics of adolescents with vs. without ≥4 days of valid wear. Twenty participants (60.6%) had ≥3 days of valid wear, 24 (72.7%) ≥2 valid days, and 27 (81.8%) ≥1 valid wear day. Acceptability ratings were neutral. Assessing physical activity with accelerometry in pregnant adolescents was neither feasible nor acceptable with the current conditions. Future research should investigate additional incentives and the potential utility of a lower wear-time criterion in pregnant adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma L. M. Clark & Lauren D. Gulley & Allison M. Hilkin & Bonny Rockette-Wagner & Heather J. Leach & Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson & Marian Tanofsky-Kraff & Kristen J. Nadeau & Stephen M. Scott & Jeanelle , 2021. "Feasibility and Acceptability of Accelerometer Measurement of Physical Activity in Pregnant Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2216-:d:504808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:5:p:2216-:d:504808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.