IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p2072-d502779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Occupational Health and Job Satisfaction in Workers with Intellectual Disability: A Job Demands–Resources Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Noelia Flores

    (Institute on Community Integration (INICO), Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Carmen Moret-Tatay

    (Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Valencia-San Vicente Mártir (UCV), 46100 Burjassot-Valencia, Spain
    Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sense Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Belén Gutiérrez-Bermejo

    (Faculty of Psychology, National University of Distance Education (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Andrea Vázquez

    (Faculty of Psychology, International University of Valencia (VIU), 46002 Valencia, Spain)

  • Cristina Jenaro

    (Institute on Community Integration (INICO), Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

In the contexts where people with intellectual disability work, there are factors that determine their job satisfaction. The objective of this study was to test the adequacy of the central assumptions of the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) theory in workers with intellectual disability employed in different work alternatives. Data from 362 workers in sheltered workshops and 192 workers in supported employment were utilized. The model was contrasted using a structural equation model and a multi-group analysis. The results supported the suitability of the model and confirmed that job demands and job resources evoke two relatively independent processes such as health impairment and motivational process. The multi-group analysis confirmed the invariance of the model between the two work alternatives. Thus, the JD-R model offers a useful framework to explain the job satisfaction of workers with intellectual disability. Implications for the improvement of personal and job results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Noelia Flores & Carmen Moret-Tatay & Belén Gutiérrez-Bermejo & Andrea Vázquez & Cristina Jenaro, 2021. "Assessment of Occupational Health and Job Satisfaction in Workers with Intellectual Disability: A Job Demands–Resources Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2072-:d:502779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/2072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Joyce & Perri Campbell & Jenny Crosbie & Erin Wilson, 2024. "Workplace Structures and Culture That Support the Wellbeing of People with an Intellectual Disability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Andrew Joyce, 2024. "A Settings and Systems Approach to Promoting the Health and Wellbeing of People with an Intellectual Disability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "“You Don’t Look Dyslexic”: Using the Job Demands—Resource Model of Burnout to Explore Employment Experiences of Australian Adults with Dyslexia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:2072-:d:502779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.