IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1443-d492875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viewing Sexual Health Education through the Lens of Critical Pedagogy: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Jarpe-Ratner

    (School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA)

  • Booker Marshall

    (Office of Student Health and Wellness, Chicago Public Schools, 42 W. Madison St., Chicago, IL 60602, USA)

Abstract

Comprehensive sexual health education (SHE) programs are being implemented in many state and local jurisdictions. Much research has focused on the strength and effectiveness of such programs. However, the experiences of teachers and students in their implementation is underexplored. A case study of the implementation of the SHE policy and curriculum in Chicago Public Schools sought to explore teachers’ and students’ experiences. Sixteen teachers were interviewed and five student focus groups, including 46 students, were conducted. Both teachers and students identified opportunities to improve upon the current program, including to (1) incorporate more student-centered learning opportunities and allow for tailoring to each specific group of students; (2) use discussion and dialogue to encourage students’ exploration of their own opinions and identities and development of a sense of agency over their own learning; (3) shift focus from risk reduction to a more holistic focus on healthy sexual wellbeing; and (4) directly discuss current health inequities, contributing factors, and intersectionality. These findings align with a critical pedagogical approach and underscore the need to understand SHE implementation within its sociopolitical context. Implications of the use of critical pedagogy as a framework for SHE in Chicago and beyond are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Jarpe-Ratner & Booker Marshall, 2021. "Viewing Sexual Health Education through the Lens of Critical Pedagogy: A Case Study in Chicago Public Schools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1443-:d:492875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce D. Missingham, 2017. "Asset-based learning and the pedagogy of community development," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 339-350, May.
    2. Farb, A.F. & Margolis, A.L., 2016. "The teen pregnancy prevention program (2010-2015): Synthesis of impact findings," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106, pages 9-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Victoria Carrera-Fernández & María Lameiras-Fernández & Nazaret Blanco-Pardo & Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro, 2021. "Preventing Violence toward Sexual and Cultural Diversity: The Role of a Queering Sex Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Senator Thomas R. Carper & Andrea Kane & Isabel Sawhill, 2018. "Following the Evidence to Reduce Unplanned Pregnancy and Improve the Lives of Children and Families," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 199-205, July.
    2. Luca, Dara Lee & Stevens, Jack & Rotz, Dana & Goesling, Brian & Lutz, Robyn, 2021. "Evaluating teen options for preventing pregnancy: Impacts and mechanisms," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Jean Knab & Russell Cole, 2022. "Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evaluation Technical Assistance: A Case Study," Evaluation Review, , vol. 46(1), pages 32-57, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1443-:d:492875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.