IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1402-d492453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Environmental Health in Australia: Failure to Launch?

Author

Listed:
  • James C. Smith

    (Environmental Health, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia)

  • Harriet Whiley

    (Environmental Health, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia)

  • Kirstin E. Ross

    (Environmental Health, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia)

Abstract

Background: The New Environmental Health is an approach to environmental health adopted in 1999. The new approach was in response to emerging health risks from the pressures that development placed on the environment, climate change, and increasing vulnerabilities of local communities. The new approach heralded a change in perception and roles within environmental health. Twenty years on, it seems these changes have not been embraced by local government. Methods: To determine whether this was the case, we assessed the use of the term “environmental health” in local government annual reports, and where environmental health functions sit within the organisational structure of councils. Results: We found that the New Environmental Health has not been adopted by councils and environmental health relates solely to the delivery of statutory services and legislative compliance. Conclusions: One result of this is local environmental health practitioners, who constitute the major health protection capability of councils, are defined by the narrow legislative obligations imposed on councils. This represents a significant lost opportunity as public health is not protected in the way that was envisaged with the adoption of the New Environmental Health.

Suggested Citation

  • James C. Smith & Harriet Whiley & Kirstin E. Ross, 2021. "The New Environmental Health in Australia: Failure to Launch?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1402-:d:492453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1402/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1402/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Surindar Dhesi & Jill Stewart, 2015. "The Developing Role of Evidence-Based Environmental Health," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    2. Awofeso, N., 2004. "What's New about the "New Public Health"?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(5), pages 705-709.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheikh Shoib & Soumitra Das & Ilham Zaidi & Miyuru Chandradasa, 2024. "Climate change and Indigenous mental health in Australia: In the aftermath of the defeat of the Voice referendum," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(3), pages 615-618, May.
    2. James C. Smith & Harriet Whiley & Kirstin E. Ross, 2023. "Climate Change and Health: Local Government Capacity for Health Protection in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Harriet Whiley & James C. Smith & Nicole Moore & Rebecca Burton & Nadia Conci & Helen Psarras & Kirstin E. Ross, 2023. "Climate Change and Health: Challenges to the Local Government Environmental Health Workforce in South Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1402-:d:492453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.