IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1368-d492044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Early Detection of Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers: Is There Room for a Screening Program?

Author

Listed:
  • Carmela Rinaldi

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy
    University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Sara Bortoluzzi

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Chiara Airoldi

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Leigheb

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy
    University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Daniele Nicolini

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Sophia Russotto

    (School of Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy)

  • Kris Vanhaecht

    (KU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Massimiliano Panella

    (Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy)

Abstract

Workforce aging is becoming a significant public health problem due to the resulting emergence of age-related diseases, such as osteoporosis. The prevention and early detection of osteoporosis is important to avoid bone fractures and their socio-economic burden. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sustainability of a screening workplace program able to detect workers with osteoporosis. The screening process included a questionnaire-based risk assessment of 1050 healthcare workers followed by measurement of the bone mass density (BMD) with a pulse-echo ultrasound (PEUS) at the proximal tibia in the at-risk subjects. Workers with a BMD value ≤ 0.783 g/cm² were referred to a specialist visit ensuring a diagnosis and the consequent prescriptions. Any possible association between the outcome variable BMD ≤ 0.783 g/cm² and the risk factors was evaluated. The costs were calculated with a full costing method. We identified 60 pathological subjects. We observed increased risks for women, older ages, and menopause ( p < 0.01). The yearly cost of our screening program estimated for this study was 8242 euros, and, considering the fragility bone fracture costs, we hypothesize a considerable economic savings, with a possible positive benefits/cost ratio of 2.07. We can say that the margin between the investment and results leads to a preference for this type of screening program. Osteoporosis is an occupational health problem, and a workplace screening program could be a cost-effective intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmela Rinaldi & Sara Bortoluzzi & Chiara Airoldi & Fabrizio Leigheb & Daniele Nicolini & Sophia Russotto & Kris Vanhaecht & Massimiliano Panella, 2021. "The Early Detection of Osteoporosis in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers: Is There Room for a Screening Program?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-7, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1368-:d:492044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Conti & Sophia Russotto & Annalisa Opizzi & Matteo Ratti & Daniele Nicolini & Kris Vanhaecht & Massimiliano Panella, 2022. "Work-Related Stress among a Cohort of Italian Long-Term Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1368-:d:492044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.