IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1271-d490543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutritional and 13-Week Subchronic Toxicological Evaluation of Lignosus rhinocerotis Mycelium in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Author

Listed:
  • I-Chen Li

    (Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd., Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan)

  • Bi-Hua Yang

    (Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd., Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan)

  • Jing-Yi Lin

    (Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd., Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan)

  • Shan Lin

    (Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd., Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Chu Chen

    (Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd., Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan
    Department of Food Science, Nutrition, and Nutraceutical Biotechnology, Shih Chien University, Taipei City 104, Taiwan
    Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan
    Department of Bioscience Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320, Taiwan)

Abstract

Lignosus rhinocerotis (Tiger’s Milk mushroom) is a novel mushroom with sclerotium belonging to the Polyporaceae family and has been reported widely to possess anti-cancer, anti-cough, antioxidant, gastro-protective, immuno-modulating, and neurite-stimulating properties. As numerous studies have proven the tremendous medicinal values of L. rhinocerotis , it is necessary to understand its nutrition as well as its safety for the recipient. Previous research on L. rhinocerotis has mainly focused on the naturally occurring sclerotium and may have overlooked mushroom mycelia from submerged liquid fermentation, which ensures a high uniform quantitative biomass production as well as a high biological value. Hence, this is the first report on the evaluation of nutrition and 13-week repeated oral toxicity of L. rhinocerotis mycelium (LRM). The LRM powder contained 9.0 ± 4.2% moisture, 1.9 ± 1.3% ash, 1.6 ± 2.2% crude lipid, 8.4 ± 5.3% crude protein, 79.3 ± 4.6% carbohydrate, and 364 kcal/100 g energy. The total free amino acid ranged from 349 to 5636 mg/100 g and the umami index of freeze-dried LRM powder was 0.37. For safety assessment, ninety-six rats were divided into four groups, each consisting of twelve male and twelve female rats. Test articles were administered by oral gavage to rats at 850, 1700, and 3400 mg/kg body weight/day for 13 weeks and reverse osmosis water was used as the control. All animals survived to the end of the study. During the experiment period, no abnormal changes were observed in clinical signs, body weight, or ophthalmological examinations. No adverse or test article-related differences were found in urinalysis, hematology, or serum biochemistry parameters between the treatment and control groups. Necropsy and histopathological examination indicated no treatment-related changes. According to the above results, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of L. rhinocerotis was identified to be greater than 3400 mg/kg body weight (BW)/day in Sprague–Dawley rats.

Suggested Citation

  • I-Chen Li & Bi-Hua Yang & Jing-Yi Lin & Shan Lin & Chin-Chu Chen, 2021. "Nutritional and 13-Week Subchronic Toxicological Evaluation of Lignosus rhinocerotis Mycelium in Sprague-Dawley Rats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1271-:d:490543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1271-:d:490543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.