IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1120-d488075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Riverside Greenway in Urban Environment: Residents’ Perception and Use of Greenways along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Zhao

    (College of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Huimin Gan

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xin Qian

    (College of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Jiahui Leng

    (College of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Yanbin Wang

    (Economic Development Research Center, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, China)

  • Peipei Wu

    (Shanghai Business School, College of Business Administration, Shanghai 200235, China)

Abstract

Urban greenways improve green coverage rates in urban environments and transform these environments in a people-oriented manner. This study adopted semantic differential (SD) methods and an importance–performance analysis (IPA) model to evaluate resident perceptions and preferences of riverside greenways. A survey of 588 residents was conducted on typical natural greenways, built greenways, and mixed greenways along the Huangpu River in Shanghai. The results showed that resident perceptions of style, space, and distance differed markedly, whereas their perceptions of environmental and psychological characteristics were relatively similar. There were strong correlations between residents’ characteristics and their perceptions, especially for their perceptions of greenway style, sense of order, and distance from the river. By comparison, most residents preferred mixed greenways. Additionally, respondents from areas with natural and mixed greenways believed that they benefited, whereas those from areas with built greenways displayed a potential sense of deprivation. The results of IPA analysis provide further support for the above conclusions. As a whole, the relatively simple methods demonstrated here could be useful to quantitatively analyze the subjective perceptions of urban residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Zhao & Huimin Gan & Xin Qian & Jiahui Leng & Yanbin Wang & Peipei Wu, 2021. "Riverside Greenway in Urban Environment: Residents’ Perception and Use of Greenways along the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1120-:d:488075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher E Anderson & Amanda Zimmerman & Skylar Lewis & John Marmion & Jeanette Gustat, 2019. "Patterns of Cyclist and Pedestrian Street Crossing Behavior and Safety on an Urban Greenway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Junga Lee & Byoung-Suk Kweon & Christopher D. Ellis & Sang-Woo Lee, 2020. "Assessing the Social Value of Ecosystem Services for Resilient Riparian Greenway Planning and Management in an Urban Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Junga Lee & Hyung-Sook Lee & Daeyoung Jeong & C. Scott Shafer & Jinhyung Chon, 2019. "The Relationship between User Perception and Preference of Greenway Trail Characteristics in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Boley, B. Bynum & McGehee, Nancy Gard & Tom Hammett, A.L., 2017. "Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 66-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiahang Lu & Xiaohua Wu, 2022. "Research on Urban Greenway Alignment Selection Based on Multisource Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Kinga Szopińska & Agnieszka Cienciała & Agnieszka Bieda & Janusz Kwiecień & Łukasz Kulesza & Piotr Parzych, 2022. "Verification of the Perception of the Local Community concerning Air Quality Using ADMS-Roads Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Abdulrahman A. Zawawi & Nicole Porter & Christopher D. Ives, 2023. "Influences on Greenways Usage for Active Transportation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, July.
    5. Qing Li & Kaili Peng & Peng Cheng, 2021. "Community-Level Urban Green Space Equity Evaluation Based on Spatial Design Network Analysis (sDNA): A Case Study of Central Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdulrahman A. Zawawi & Nicole Porter & Christopher D. Ives, 2023. "Influences on Greenways Usage for Active Transportation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, July.
    2. Nannan Zhao & Zheng Liu & Yanliu Lin & Bruno De Meulder, 2019. "User, Public, and Professional Perceptions of the Greenways in the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Sung-Shun Weng & Yang Liu & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2019. "Reform of Chinese Universities in the Context of Sustainable Development: Teacher Evaluation and Improvement Based on Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Michele Preziosi & Alessia Acampora & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "Delighting Hotel Guests with Sustainability: Revamping Importance-Performance Analysis in the Light of the Three-Factor Theory of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Say-Wah Lee & Chuen-Wah Seow & Ke Xue, 2021. "Residents’ Sustainable City Evaluation, Satisfaction and Loyalty: Integrating Importance-Performance Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    6. I Ketut Sudiarta & I Made Suwitra & I Ngurah Suryawan, 2022. "Evaluation of the implementation of ecotourism principles in the operation of diving tourism in Bali, Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 432-438, June.
    7. Chrysa Vizmpa & George Botzoris & Panagiotis Lemonakis & Athanasios Galanis, 2023. "Micromobility in Urban Trail Paths: Expanding and Strengthening the Planning of 15-Minute Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Soon-Jin Hwang, 2020. "Eutrophication and the Ecological Health Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-6, August.
    9. Angelo Antoci & Paolo Russu & Pier Luigi Sacco & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2022. "Preying on beauty? The complex social dynamics of overtourism," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(1), pages 379-400, January.
    10. Chunyan Zhu & Jingzhu Li & Jinming Luo & Xi Li & Tianhui Li & Wei Wang & Shanshan Fu & Weizhen Zeng, 2024. "An Investigation of the Restorative Benefits of Different Spaces in an Urban Riverside Greenway for College Students—A Simple Autumn Outdoor Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    12. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Chenxi Li & Zhihong Zong & Haichao Qie & Yingying Fang & Qiao Liu, 2023. "CiteSpace and Bibliometric Analysis of Published Research on Forest Ecosystem Services for the Period 2018–2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Liang Li & Xinyue Gao & Jingni Li & Lu Meng & Ziyao Wang & Lu Yang, 2022. "Difference of Usage Behavior between Urban Greenway and Suburban Greenway: A Case Study in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Ida Rašovská & Marketa Kubickova & Kateřina Ryglová, 2021. "Importance–performance analysis approach to destination management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 777-794, June.
    16. Bin Xu & Qingxia Shi & Yaping Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation of the Health Promotion Capabilities of Greenway Trails: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Daisy XF Fan & Anyu Liu & Richard TR Qiu, 2019. "Revisiting the relationship between host attitudes and tourism development: A utility maximization approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(2), pages 171-188, March.
    18. Natalia Fumagalli & Matteo Maccarini & Roberto Rovelli & Rita Berto & Giulio Senes, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of Users’ Preference for Different Planting Combinations along Rural Greenways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Cai, Gangwei & Xu, Binyan & Lu, Feidong & Lu, Ye, 2023. "The promotion strategies and dynamic evaluation model of exhibition-driven sustainable tourism based on previous/prospective tourist satisfaction after COVID-19," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Chen, Pin-Zheng & Liu, Wan-Yu, 2019. "Assessing management performance of the national forest park using impact range-performance analysis and impact-asymmetry analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1120-:d:488075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.