IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1050-d486576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Psychological Comfort of Paramedics for Field Termination of Resuscitation through Structured Training

Author

Listed:
  • Chungli Bang

    (Acute & Emergency Care Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore 768828, Singapore)

  • Desmond Ren Hao Mao

    (Acute & Emergency Care Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore 768828, Singapore)

  • Rebacca Chew Ying Cheng

    (Acute & Emergency Care Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore 768828, Singapore)

  • Jen Heng Pek

    (Emergency Department, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore)

  • Mihir Gandhi

    (Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore 138669, Singapore
    Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore)

  • Shalini Arulanandam

    (Emergency Medical Services Department, Singapore Civil Defence Force, Singapore 408827, Singapore)

  • Marcus Eng Hock Ong

    (Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore)

  • Stella Quah

    (Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of a newly developed structured training on Singapore paramedics’ psychological comfort before the implementation of a prehospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) protocol. Following a before and after study design, the paramedics underwent a self-administered questionnaire to assess their psychological comfort level applying the TOR protocol, 22 months before and one month after a 3-h structured training session. The questionnaire addressed five domains: sociocultural attitudes on resuscitation and TOR, multi-tasking, feelings towards resuscitation and TOR, interactions with colleagues and bystanders and informing survivors. Overall psychological comfort total (PCT) scores and domain-specific scores were compared using the paired t-test with higher scores representing greater comfort. Ninety-six of the 345 eligible paramedics responded. There was no statistically significant change in the mean PCT scores at baseline and post-training; however, the “feelings towards resuscitation and TOR” domain improved by 4.77% (95% CI 1.42 to 8.13 and p = 0.006) and the multi-tasking domain worsened by 4.11% (95% CI −7.82 to −0.41 and p = 0.030). While the structured training did not impact on the overall psychological comfort levels, it led to improvements in the feelings of paramedics towards resuscitation and TOR. Challenges remain in improving paramedics’ psychological comfort levels towards TOR.

Suggested Citation

  • Chungli Bang & Desmond Ren Hao Mao & Rebacca Chew Ying Cheng & Jen Heng Pek & Mihir Gandhi & Shalini Arulanandam & Marcus Eng Hock Ong & Stella Quah, 2021. "Improving Psychological Comfort of Paramedics for Field Termination of Resuscitation through Structured Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1050-:d:486576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1050-:d:486576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.