Author
Listed:
- Kyoung Suk Lee
(College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) four Project, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea)
- Yoo Mi Cho
(College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea)
- Sung Hee Oh
(College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 35051, Korea)
- Mi Sook Jung
(College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 35051, Korea)
- Ju Young Yoon
(College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) four Project, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea)
Abstract
Patients with heart failure (HF) may not receive enough HF education from their clinicians throughout the course of the illness. Given that information is readily accessible on the Internet, patients with HF may seek HF information online. However, the relevance of online information for patients, the health literacy demand, and quality of the information is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the HF topics available online with topics HF patients perceived to be important and to evaluate the health literacy demand and quality of online HF information. The most popular search engines and a website that ranks the popularity of the websites were searched to identify websites with HF information. The health literacy demand and quality of the information were evaluated using the Patient Education Material Evaluation Tool for Print Materials and the DISCERN tool, respectively. First, the HF Patients’ Learning Needs Inventory (HFPLNI) was used to determine whether the websites included the 46 topics identified in this inventory. Patients with HF ( n = 126) then completed the HFPLNI to rate the perceived importance on each topic. A chi-square test was used to compare the differences between the topics on the websites and those patients perceived to be important. Of the 46 topics, 39 were less likely to be included on the websites even though patients perceived that they were important topics. Information on the websites ( n = 99) was not written could not be easily understood by patients and did not meet the overall health literacy demands of 58.0% and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. Only one-fifth of the websites were rated as fair to good quality. Online HF information had high health literacy demand and was poor quality with mostly generic HF information, which did not meet patients’ information needs. Websites need to be developed reflecting patients’ learning needs with low health literacy demand and good quality.
Suggested Citation
Kyoung Suk Lee & Yoo Mi Cho & Sung Hee Oh & Mi Sook Jung & Ju Young Yoon, 2021.
"Evaluation of the Heart Failure in Internet Patient Information: Descriptive Survey Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1047-:d:486553
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- So‐Sun Kim & Sunhee Lee & GiYon Kim & Seok‐Min Kang & Jeong‐Ah Ahn, 2014.
"Effects of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with coronary heart disease in Korea,"
Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 476-482, December.
- Sultan M Mosleh & Nidal F Eshah & Mona MA Almalik, 2017.
"Perceived learning needs according to patients who have undergone major coronary interventions and their nurses,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 418-426, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1047-:d:486553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.