IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1020-d486129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Marques

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

  • Paulo Ribeiro

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carlos Falcão

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Bernardo Ferreira Lemos

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Blanca Ríos-Carrasco

    (Department of Periodontology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • José Vicente Ríos-Santos

    (Department of Periodontology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Mariano Herrero-Climent

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Introduction. Digital impressions in implant dentistry rely on many variables, and their accuracy, particularly in complete edentulous patients, is not well understood. Aim. The purpose of this literature review was to determine which factors may influence the accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry. Emphasized attention was given to the design of the intra-oral scan body (ISB) and scanning techniques. Materials and methods. A Medline, PubMed and EBSCO Host databases search, complemented by a hand search, was performed in order to select relevant reports regarding the appliance of digital impressions in implant dentistry. The search subject included but was not limited to accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry, digital scanning techniques, the design and material of the ISBs, and the depth and angulation of the implant. The related titles and abstracts were screened, and the remaining articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for full-text readings. Results. The literature search conducted for this review initially resulted in 108 articles, among which only 21 articles fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Studies were evaluated according to five subjects: accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry; the design and material of the intra-oral scan bodies; scanning technique; the influence of implants depth/angulations on the digital impression and accuracy of different intra-oral scanner devices. Conclusions. The accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry depends on several aspects. The depth/angulation of the implant, the experience of the operator, the intra-oral scanner used, and environmental conditions may influence the accuracy of digital impressions in implant dentistry. However, it seems that ISBs’ design and material, as well as scanning technique, have a major impact on the trueness and precision of digital impressions in implant dentistry. Future research is suggested for the better understanding of this subject, focusing on the optimization of the ISB design and scanning protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Marques & Paulo Ribeiro & Carlos Falcão & Bernardo Ferreira Lemos & Blanca Ríos-Carrasco & José Vicente Ríos-Santos & Mariano Herrero-Climent, 2021. "Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1020-:d:486129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo Ribeiro & Mariano Herrero-Climent & Carmen Díaz-Castro & José Vicente Ríos-Santos & Roberto Padrós & Javier Gil Mur & Carlos Falcão, 2018. "Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions—An In Vitro Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz & Victoria Schubert & Alexander Schmidt & Bernd Wöstmann & Sabine Ruf & Katharina Klaus, 2020. "Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. María Isabel Albanchez-González & Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann & Jesús Peláez-Rico & Carlos López-Suárez & Verónica Rodríguez-Alonso & María Jesús Suárez-García, 2022. "Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1020-:d:486129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.