IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i2p575-d478749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Jusdado-García

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background. The shoulder in CrossFit should have a balance between mobility and stability. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and posterior shoulder stiffness are risk factors for overhead shoulder injury. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and horizontal adduction stretch in CrossFit practitioners’ shoulders. Methods: Twenty-one regular CrossFitters were allocated to experimental (stretching with isometric contraction and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization) or control groups (instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization). Each session lasted 5 min, 2 days a week, over a period of 4 weeks. Shoulder internal rotation and horizontal adduction (digital inclinometer), as well as posterior shoulder stretch perception (Park scale), were evaluated. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to analyze the distribution of the sample. Parametric Student’s t -test was used to obtain the intragroup differences. The inter- and intra-rater differences were calculated using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Average age was 30.81 years (SD: 5.35), with an average height of 178 (SD: 7.93) cm and average weight of 82.69 (SD: 10.82) kg. Changes were found in the experimental group following intervention ( p < 0.05), and when comparing baseline and follow-up assessments ( p < 0.05) in all variables. Significant differences were found in the control group following intervention ( p < 0.05), in right horizontal adduction and left internal rotation. When comparing the perception of internal rotation and horizontal adduction in both groups, significant differences were found. Conclusions. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization can improve shoulder horizontal adduction and internal rotation. An instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique yields the same results alone as those achieved in combination with post-isometric stretch with shoulder adduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Jusdado-García & Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, 2021. "Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:575-:d:478749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael Martínez-Gómez & Pedro L. Valenzuela & Lidia B. Alejo & Jaime Gil-Cabrera & Almudena Montalvo-Pérez & Eduardo Talavera & Alejandro Lucia & Susana Moral-González & David Barranco-Gil, 2020. "Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomás Ponce-García & Javier Benítez-Porres & Jerónimo Carmelo García-Romero & Alejandro Castillo-Domínguez & José Ramón Alvero-Cruz, 2021. "The Anaerobic Power Assessment in CrossFit ® Athletes: An Agreement Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Antonio Cejudo, 2022. "Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit ® Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:2:p:575-:d:478749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.